★ gold card = confirmed star pick: the model's strongest profile (top tier, great zone matchup, real season power) and he's officially in the lineup batting 1st–4th. Roughly 1 in 5 of these homers — that's what elite looks like in this game.
☆ dashed card = provisional: same profile, lineup not posted yet. Research these in the morning; by ~4:30 they turn solid gold (confirmed) or disappear. Only confirmed ★ picks count in the record.
The numbers
The big % — calibrated chance he homers tonight. 20% ≈ elite. Honest: when it says 16%, about 16% actually do.
🔥 hot — 10-day contact quality (barrels, exit velo), not a count of recent homers. Last 5 — hits-for-at-bats each game, oldest → newest; green = homered that game.
The tags
zone matchup! — the starter throws to exactly the spots this batter punishes. Best signal on the board.
ice cold — no HR in 2 weeks, contact way down (hidden by default).
bad HR weather — cold/wind-in games really do suppress homers.
HR-prone SP (trap!) — bad pitcher, but picking batters because of a bad pitcher loses (5.6% hit rate). Tiebreaker, never the reason.
The Edge report
The Edge tab runs the hand-research process automatically: each starter's vulnerable pitches from his last 3 starts (by batter hand, with usage drift), crossed with every opposing batter's last-10 batted-ball events vs those exact pitch types, plus bullpen fatigue and the directional HR-carry strip.
Badges on batter cards: TAKE = 2+ HR in his last 5 batted balls vs a vulnerable pitch. STANDOUT = sees the pitch 30%+ and crushes it. Grey EDGE = a lighter note. Red MUST-THROW = he crushes the starter's #1 pitch to his side and it comes 35%+ of the time — the pitcher cannot avoid him. Open the card's "Edge report details" section for the per-pitch numbers and today's spray fit.
Spray fit (×1.00 = neutral): how much today's wind and park boost the zones where HIS damage actually lands. ×1.5+ means the weather is working specifically for him.
A ★ star and a TAKE badge = the model and the research method agree — the strongest play on the board.
The quality stats — wOBA/xwOBA and SLG/xSLG
wOBA = what actually happened at the plate (like batting average, but weighting doubles/homers properly). xwOBA = what SHOULD have happened based on how hard and at what angle he hit the ball. Same idea for SLG (actual power results) vs xSLG (deserved power).
The drawer's rolling 100-PA charts plot both: grey = actual, red = deserved, dashed line = league average. Red above grey = he's better than his results — buy before the box scores catch up. Grey above red = he's been lucky; trust the red line, not the surface stats.
All four appear in the Season / Last 30 / Last 14 tabs so you can spot a quality surge (xSLG jumping in the L14) before the homers arrive — the same logic as barrels-over-results, at the stat-line level.
The record
The banner tracks every confirmed ★ pick since Aug 24 — hits and misses, no cherry-picking. Judge after ~150 picks, not one night.
All batters
By game
Pitchers
Edge
Selections
Slips
Report
Edge Report Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Brian's method, automated: vulnerable pitches from each starter's last 3 starts (by batter hand, with usage drift), crossed with every opposing batter's last-10 batted-ball events vs those exact pitch types. Built 6:01 AM ET · back to the board
TAKE = 2+ HR in his last 5 BBE vs a vulnerable pitch. STANDOUT = sees the pitch 30%+, crushes it (HR or barrels in L10 BBE). PROVEN = season-long skill vs the pitch type (20+ BBE, xSLG .500+ or 10%+ barrels) without a recent trail — the 'he can handle it' read; strongest cell = recent trail AND season skill (bold season column). Vulnerable pitch = 18%+ recent usage and homered on / barreled / hit 93+ EV with flyballs, last 3 starts. drift = usage now vs season. spray fit = how much today's wind/park boosts HIS landing zones (x1.00 = neutral), with his favorite sector, share, and avg HR distance vs this hand.
Los Angeles Dodgers @ Cincinnati Reds · NEUTRAL
Great American Ball Park · weather NEUTRAL · 92°F, wind 3 mph · air density -5.3% (carry +13 ft)
LF1.54LF1.51LC1.47CF1.43CF1.39RC1.35RF1.32RF1.29
HR carry by field today (typical park = 1.00; physics estimate from wind/temp/park). Best: LF 1.54
Every Edge play with every layer — exposure (usage + arsenal rank to his side), reaction (L10 batted balls vs the pitch), quality charts (x-stats vs actuals), and the weather verdict. Built 6:02 AM ET · board
124 Edge batters, ranked by the method only — exposure, reaction, environment, escape routes, charts. The model's number is shown for reference but carries no rank weight. Tap a name for the full case.
VALUE TIER — 10 · bottom-half slots / part-timers with BOTH layers live (recent trail + season fit), ranked xISO-proven first (.160+ on 150+ AB hit 13.5% vs 10.3% in this cohort — backtested 9/6). Price plays: ~11% base at long odds — sprinkle singles, never slip legs.
Aaron Judge (22%, slot ? · 292 PA szn) — Slider 26% off Bailey OberL10: 0 HR/2 brl · season x0.655 1 HR (17 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.304 (243 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Spencer Jones (21%, slot ? · 256 PA szn) — Four-Seam 28% off Bailey OberL10: 2 HR/5 brl · season x0.706 2 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.199 (227 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Christian Encarnacion-Strand (18%, slot ? · 179 PA szn) — Four-Seam 34% off Sean ManaeaL10: 2 HR/3 brl · season x1.281 3 HR (14 BBE, vs LHP) · xISO 0.246 (164 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Victor Mesa Jr. (16%, slot ? · 223 PA szn) — Four-Seam 22% off Jack PerkinsL10: 2 HR/2 brl · season x0.624 5 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.196 (199 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Randal Grichuk (15%, slot ? · 259 PA szn) — Changeup 19% off Foster GriffinL10: 0 HR/2 brl · season x0.809 2 HR (26 BBE, vs LHP) · xISO 0.176 (245 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Jose Siri (14%, slot ? · 226 PA szn) — Four-Seam 46% off Logan GilbertL10: 1 HR/2 brl · season x0.782 1 HR (16 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.196 (206 AB) ✦ POWER-PROVEN
Adael Amador (14%, slot ? · 59 PA szn) — Four-Seam 24% off Walker BuehlerL10: 1 HR/1 brl · season x0.507 2 HR (12 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.127 (51 AB — thin, shown not ranked)
Brett Sullivan (14%, slot ? · 230 PA szn) — Four-Seam 24% off Walker BuehlerL10: 2 HR/1 brl · season x0.611 5 HR (42 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.117 (211 AB, below .160 line)
Nolan Gorman (13%, slot ? · 298 PA szn) — Four-Seam 38% off Blade TidwellL10: 1 HR/3 brl · season x0.708 5 HR (45 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.157 (263 AB, below .160 line)
Hunter Feduccia (12%, slot ? · 244 PA szn) — Four-Seam 37% off Rhett LowderL10: 1 HR/2 brl · season x0.774 3 HR (40 BBE, vs RHP) · xISO 0.126 (214 AB, below .160 line)
MUST-THROW watch — 46 · he crushes the starter's #1 pitch to his side, thrown 35%+ (no way to pitch around it)
Pete Crow-Armstrong — 0 HR L10 vs Sinker, Martín Pérez throws it 59% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 11 BBE, FB 27% · velo 89.2 (-0.1 vs szn)
Michael Busch — 1 HR L10 vs Sinker, Martín Pérez throws it 59% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 11 BBE, FB 27% · velo 89.2 (-0.1 vs szn)
Ronald Acuña Jr. — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 53% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 17 BBE, FB 35% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Austin Riley — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 53% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 17 BBE, FB 35% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Sean Murphy — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 53% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 17 BBE, FB 35% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Dominic Canzone — 0 HR L10 vs Cutter, Ryan Johnson throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 23%, drift +12pp · velo 89.7
Cal Raleigh — 2 HR L10 vs Cutter, Ryan Johnson throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 23%, drift +12pp · velo 89.7
Lazaro Montes — 1 HR L10 vs Cutter, Ryan Johnson throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 23%, drift +12pp · velo 89.7
Josh Naylor — 0 HR L10 vs Cutter, Ryan Johnson throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 23%, drift +12pp · velo 89.7
Matt Olson — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE, FB 17% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Drake Baldwin — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE, FB 17% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Michael Harris II — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE, FB 17% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Mike Yastrzemski — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE, FB 17% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Dominic Smith — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Kevin Gausman throws it 49% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE, FB 17% · velo 93.5 (-0.4 vs szn)
Sean Keys — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Drew Anderson throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 38% · velo 94.3 (-1.1 vs szn)
Brandon Valenzuela — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Drew Anderson throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 38% · velo 94.3 (-1.1 vs szn)
Josh Smith — 2 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Drew Anderson throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 38% · velo 94.3 (-1.1 vs szn)
Brett Bateman — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Drew Anderson throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE, FB 38% · velo 94.3 (-1.1 vs szn)
Mike Trout — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE, FB 54% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Zach Neto — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE, FB 54% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Jose Siri — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE, FB 54% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Vaughn Grissom — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE, FB 54% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Christian Moore — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 46% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE, FB 54% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Moisés Ballesteros — 2 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 43% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 8 BBE, FB 12% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Josh Lowe — 2 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 43% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 8 BBE, FB 12% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Dylan Crews — 0 HR L10 vs Sinker, Cristopher Sánchez throws it 43% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 19 BBE, FB 21% · velo 94.8 (-0.2 vs szn)
Andrew Pinckney — 1 HR L10 vs Sinker, Cristopher Sánchez throws it 43% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 19 BBE, FB 21% · velo 94.8 (-0.2 vs szn)
Adam Frazier — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Logan Gilbert throws it 43% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 8 BBE, FB 12% · velo 96.8 (+0.4 vs szn)
Juan Soto — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
Francisco Lindor — 3 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
Brett Baty — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
A.J. Ewing — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
Jared Young — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
Carson Benge — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Shane Baz throws it 42% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE, FB 71% · velo 95.1 (-0.8 vs szn)
Leo Bernal — 2 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Blade Tidwell throws it 38% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 78% · velo 95.0 (-0.3 vs szn)
Alec Burleson — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Blade Tidwell throws it 38% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 78% · velo 95.0 (-0.3 vs szn)
Nolan Gorman — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Blade Tidwell throws it 38% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 78% · velo 95.0 (-0.3 vs szn)
Bryan Torres — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Blade Tidwell throws it 38% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 2 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 78% · velo 95.0 (-0.3 vs szn)
Max Muncy — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Josue De Paula — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Kyle Tucker — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Freddie Freeman — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Hunter Feduccia — 1 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Alex Freeland — 0 HR L10 vs Four-Seam, Rhett Lowder throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +10pp · velo 94.5 (+0.8 vs szn)
Jo Adell — 1 HR L10 vs Sinker, Davis Martin throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +11pp · velo 92.6 (-0.2 vs szn)
Austin Hedges — 2 HR L10 vs Sinker, Davis Martin throws it 37% (#1 to his side)pitch last 3 starts: 1 HR, 0 brl on 9 BBE, FB 33%, drift +11pp · velo 92.6 (-0.2 vs szn)
☆ Ben Rice ⤢ full card24%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade A
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (2 pulled), 70.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 224-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 13 HR, 30.8% barrels, 1.157 xSLG over 65 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.403 vs wOBA 0.397 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.42 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (42.3%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (23.3%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 70.0% · avg 224 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.403 · wOBA 0.397rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.523 · SLG 0.524quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.42 toward his zones (CF 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
☆ Matt Olson ⤢ full card24%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 49%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade A
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 49.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels, 70.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 220-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 11 HR, 24.7% barrels, 0.879 xSLG over 85 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.372 vs wOBA 0.221 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.27 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 49.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 49% / FS 47%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (47.0%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.02 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 60.0% · avg 220 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.372 · wOBA 0.221rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.409 · SLG 0.250quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.27 toward his zones (RF 21% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
☆ Elly De La Cruz ⤢ full card23%TAKE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (3 in the last 5), 6 barrels (3 pulled), 100.0% hard, 90.0% in the air, 289-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 8 HR, 21.6% barrels, 0.867 xSLG over 88 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.501 vs xwOBA 0.464 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FS 29% / FF 28% / CU 24%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSplitter (29.4%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (23.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.07 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (3 in last 5) · 6 barrels (3 pulled) · hard 100.0% · air 90.0% · avg 289 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.464 · wOBA 0.501rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.640 · SLG 0.689results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Max Muncy ⤢ full card22%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 70.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 257-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 9 HR, 15.9% barrels, 0.814 xSLG over 82 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.409 vs xwOBA 0.315 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (26.6%): damages itSlider (19.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 80.0% · avg 257 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.315 · wOBA 0.409rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.466 · SLG 0.518results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Aaron Judge ⤢ full card22%PROVEN
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade A-
Secondary exposure: the slider comes 26.1% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 162-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 17.6% barrels, 0.655 xSLG over 17 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.327 > wOBA 0.282). Weather works for him (carry ×1.36 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 26.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 32% / SL 26% / ST 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (31.8%): damages itSweeper (23.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.14 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 40.0% · avg 162 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.327 · wOBA 0.282rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.407 · SLG 0.276quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.36 toward his zones (CF 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
☆ Spencer Jones ⤢ full card21%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR, 5 barrels (2 pulled), 80.0% hard, 90.0% in the air, 273-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 19.6% barrels, 0.706 xSLG over 46 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.385 vs xwOBA 0.361 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.37 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (42.3%): damages itSlider (23.3%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (0 in last 5) · 5 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 80.0% · air 90.0% · avg 273 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.361 · wOBA 0.385rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.507 · SLG 0.522results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.37 toward his zones (CF 27% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
☆ Pete Alonso ⤢ full card21%PROVEN
Baltimore Orioles · vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade A
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 33.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 2 barrels, 70.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 179-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 15.2% barrels, 0.764 xSLG over 46 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.490 vs wOBA 0.383 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.24 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 33.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 34% / ST 26% / CH 15%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (25.8%): damages itChangeup (15.2%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.47 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 60.0% · avg 179 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.490 · wOBA 0.383rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.514 · SLG 0.494quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Leo Bernal ⤢ full card21%TAKEMUST-THROW 38%
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.7% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 50.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 264-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 38% / ST 25% / SI 18%
Can he be pitched around?
coverage unclear (thin samples)Sweeper (25.3%): thin sampleSinker (17.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.71 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 80.0% · avg 264 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Luis García Jr. ⤢ full card21%PROVEN
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 90.0% in the air, 281-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 15.9% barrels, 0.685 xSLG over 82 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.382 vs xwOBA 0.358 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.44 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (42.3%): damages itSlider (23.3%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 90.0% · avg 281 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.358 · wOBA 0.382rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.520 · SLG 0.543results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.44 toward his zones (RC 21% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Coby Mayo ⤢ full card21%TAKE
Baltimore Orioles · vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade A
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 33.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 60.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 256-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 21.4% barrels, 1.121 xSLG over 28 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.406 vs wOBA 0.394 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 33.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 34% / ST 26% / CH 15%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (25.8%): handles itChangeup (15.2%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.47 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 70.0% · avg 256 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.406 · wOBA 0.394rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.616 · SLG 0.567quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (LF 29% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Junior Caminero ⤢ full card21%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the cutter comes 20.3% of the time to righties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 163-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 3 HR, 19.4% barrels, 0.586 xSLG over 31 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.381 vs xwOBA 0.345 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 20.3% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: ST 32% / SI 22% / FC 20%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (31.6%): handles itSinker (21.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.50 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 163 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.345 · wOBA 0.381rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.469 · SLG 0.506results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Kyle Schwarber ⤢ full card20%PROVEN
Philadelphia Phillies · vs Jackson Kent (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the four-seam comes 24.4% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 40.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 132-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 5 HR, 15.2% barrels, 0.81 xSLG over 33 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.317 vs wOBA 0.314 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works against him — that alone drops him a tier. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.4% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / SL 29% / FF 24%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (33.3%): damages itSlider (28.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 40.0% · avg 132 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.317 · wOBA 0.314rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.528 · SLG 0.460quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
AGAINST him — conditions suppress his sectors (×0.76)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Nelson Velázquez ⤢ full card20%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade A-
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 3 barrels (2 pulled), 88.9% hard, 77.8% in the air, 245-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.32 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (20.0%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (16.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 3 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 88.9% · air 77.8% · avg 245 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.32 toward his zones (LC 40% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Mike Trout ⤢ full card20%PROVENMUST-THROW 46%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.2% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 209-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 6 HR, 14.7% barrels, 0.699 xSLG over 95 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.39 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / SL 30% / FS 12%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSlider (29.7%): handles itSplitter (12.4%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 209 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.39 toward his zones (LC 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Pete Crow-Armstrong ⤢ full card19%PROVENMUST-THROW 59%
Chicago Cubs · vs Martín Pérez (lefty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade C — model play only
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 58.8% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 30.0% in the air, 87-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 0 HR, 2.9% barrels, 0.523 xSLG over 34 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.434 vs xwOBA 0.364 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.24 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 58.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 59% / CH 24% / FC 14%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (23.8%): damages itCutter (13.8%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Dylan Lee 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.42 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 30.0% · avg 87 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.364 · wOBA 0.434rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.718 · SLG 0.667results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Sal Stewart ⤢ full card19%STANDOUT
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 218-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 7 HR, 19.6% barrels, 0.829 xSLG over 56 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (19.8%): handles itSplitter (17.8%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 60.0% · avg 218 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Zach Neto ⤢ full card19%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.2% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 200-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 6 HR, 13.6% barrels, 0.694 xSLG over 66 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.411 vs xwOBA 0.388 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.45 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / SL 30% / FS 12%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSlider (29.7%): handles itSplitter (12.4%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 200 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.388 · wOBA 0.411rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.510 · SLG 0.581results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.45 toward his zones (LF 24% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Juan Soto ⤢ full card19%PROVENMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 160-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 7 HR, 24.1% barrels, 1.035 xSLG over 54 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.21 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): struggles — an escape routeChangeup (16.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 160 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Hunter Goodman ⤢ full card18%PROVEN
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the cutter comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 30.0% in the air, 117-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 12.5% barrels, 0.541 xSLG over 24 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.328 > wOBA 0.274). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 29.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 30% / SI 23% / SL 12%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (23.4%): damages itSlider (12.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.65 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 30.0% · avg 117 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.328 · wOBA 0.274rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.420 · SLG 0.444quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Christian Encarnacion-Strand ⤢ full card18%TAKE
Baltimore Orioles · vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade A-
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 33.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 3 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 257-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 42.9% barrels, 1.281 xSLG over 14 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.347 vs xwOBA 0.310 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.26 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 33.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 34% / ST 26% / CH 15%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (25.8%): handles itChangeup (15.2%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.47 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 3 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 80.0% · avg 257 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.310 · wOBA 0.347rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.410 · SLG 0.446results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.26 toward his zones (CF 29% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Dominic Canzone ⤢ full card18%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Seattle Mariners · vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the cutter comes 49.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 227-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 17.4% barrels, 0.761 xSLG over 23 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.333 > wOBA 0.309). Weather works for him (carry ×1.26 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 49.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 49% / ST 24% / FS 22%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (23.6%): struggles — an escape routeSplitter (21.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 80.0% · avg 227 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.333 · wOBA 0.309rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.439 · SLG 0.415quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.26 toward his zones (CF 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Ronald Acuña Jr. ⤢ full card18%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 53%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 52.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 246-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 12.1% barrels, 0.573 xSLG over 66 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.378 vs xwOBA 0.300 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.28 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 52.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 53% / FS 34%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (34.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.03Starter vs his hand: ≈1.68 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 80.0% · avg 246 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.300 · wOBA 0.378rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.451 · SLG 0.500results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.28 toward his zones (LF 16% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
☆ Miguel Vargas ⤢ full card18%EDGE
Chicago White Sox · vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the changeup comes 18.8% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 70.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 182-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 6.2% barrels, 0.622 xSLG over 32 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.358 vs xwOBA 0.324 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.67 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet · provisional ☆.
The pitch — exposure
Changeup — 18.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 38% / CH 19% / FF 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (38.1%): damages itFour-Seam (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.21 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 60.0% · avg 182 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.324 · wOBA 0.358rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.396 · SLG 0.357results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.67 toward his zones (LF 26% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Drake Baldwin ⤢ full card17%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 49.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 240-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 4 HR, 13.7% barrels, 0.705 xSLG over 73 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.360 vs xwOBA 0.314 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 49.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 49% / FS 47%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (47.0%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.02 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 240 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.314 · wOBA 0.360rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.425 · SLG 0.467results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (CF 29% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jackson Merrill ⤢ full card17%EDGE
San Diego Padres · vs Kyle Freeland (lefty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade C
Secondary exposure: the cutter comes 23.7% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 57.1% hard, 42.9% in the air, 198-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.396 vs xwOBA 0.390 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 23.7% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 31% / FC 24% / KC 22%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (31.2%): struggles — an escape routeKnuckle-Curve (21.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Zach Agnos 14.7 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈0.72 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 57.1% · air 42.9% · avg 198 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.390 · wOBA 0.396rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.617 · SLG 0.560results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jac Caglianone ⤢ full card17%PROVEN
Kansas City Royals · vs Hunter Brown (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 29.9% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 80.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 170-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 19.7% barrels, 0.852 xSLG over 61 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.469 vs xwOBA 0.362 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.9% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 30% / SI 28% / KC 17%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (28.4%): damages itKnuckle-Curve (16.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.13 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 80.0% · air 50.0% · avg 170 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.362 · wOBA 0.469rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.536 · SLG 0.642results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (CF 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Eugenio Suárez ⤢ full card17%TAKE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 4 HR (3 in the last 5), 4 barrels (1 pulled), 70.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 290-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 10 HR, 26.5% barrels, 0.856 xSLG over 49 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.393 vs xwOBA 0.385 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (19.8%): damages itSplitter (17.8%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
4 HR (3 in last 5) · 4 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 70.0% · avg 290 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.385 · wOBA 0.393rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.436 · SLG 0.468results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Mickey Moniak ⤢ full card17%STANDOUT
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade C — model play only
Primary-pitch exposure: the cutter comes 32.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 191-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Chart caution: wOBA 0.225 vs xwOBA 0.216 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 32.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (24.5%): handles itSinker (21.0%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 50.0% · avg 191 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.216 · wOBA 0.225rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.272 · SLG 0.284results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cal Raleigh ⤢ full card17%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 49%
Seattle Mariners · vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the cutter comes 49.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 30.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 236-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 12.5% barrels, 0.604 xSLG over 24 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.440 vs xwOBA 0.377 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.21 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 49.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 49% / ST 24% / FS 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (23.6%): handles itSplitter (21.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 70.0% · avg 236 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.377 · wOBA 0.440rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.572 · SLG 0.663results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Victor Mesa Jr. ⤢ full card16%TAKE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 22.1% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 60.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 256-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 15.2% barrels, 0.624 xSLG over 46 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.397 vs xwOBA 0.292 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 22.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 24% / FF 22% / CH 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (23.8%): damages itChangeup (22.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.62 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 80.0% · avg 256 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.292 · wOBA 0.397rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.488 · SLG 0.576results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Austin Riley ⤢ full card16%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 53%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 52.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 20.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 186-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 4 HR, 10.7% barrels, 0.593 xSLG over 75 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.306 > wOBA 0.282). Weather works for him (carry ×1.30 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 52.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 53% / FS 34%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (34.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.03Starter vs his hand: ≈1.68 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 50.0% · avg 186 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.306 · wOBA 0.282rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.373 · SLG 0.341quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.30 toward his zones (CF 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Alec Burleson ⤢ full card16%PROVENMUST-THROW 38%
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.7% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 80.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 227-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 14.3% barrels, 0.814 xSLG over 84 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.345 > wOBA 0.303). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 38% / ST 25% / SI 18%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSweeper (25.3%): handles itSinker (17.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.71 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 80.0% · air 60.0% · avg 227 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.345 · wOBA 0.303rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.383 · SLG 0.333quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Tyler Stephenson ⤢ full card16%TAKE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (2 in the last 5), 3 barrels, 60.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 272-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 4 HR, 17.5% barrels, 0.841 xSLG over 57 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.319 vs xwOBA 0.252 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (19.8%): handles itSplitter (17.8%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (2 in last 5) · 3 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 70.0% · avg 272 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.252 · wOBA 0.319rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.295 · SLG 0.430results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jonathan Aranda ⤢ full card16%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 22.1% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 50.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 142-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 9.7% barrels, 0.631 xSLG over 113 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.339 vs xwOBA 0.309 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 22.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 24% / FF 22% / CH 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (23.8%): damages itChangeup (22.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.62 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 40.0% · avg 142 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.309 · wOBA 0.339rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.403 · SLG 0.418results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Connor Norby ⤢ full card16%EDGE
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the cutter comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 235-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 13.3% barrels, 0.625 xSLG over 15 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.405 vs xwOBA 0.305 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 29.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 30% / SI 23% / SL 12%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (23.4%): handles itSlider (12.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.65 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 60.0% · avg 235 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.305 · wOBA 0.405rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.466 · SLG 0.506results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Bryce Harper ⤢ full card16%PROVEN
Philadelphia Phillies · vs Jackson Kent (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the four-seam comes 24.4% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 70.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 196-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 10.0% barrels, 0.783 xSLG over 20 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.438 vs xwOBA 0.385 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works against him — that alone drops him a tier. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.4% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / SL 29% / FF 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (33.3%): handles itSlider (28.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 80.0% · avg 196 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.385 · wOBA 0.438rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.482 · SLG 0.512results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
AGAINST him — conditions suppress his sectors (×0.76)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Amed Rosario ⤢ full card16%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade A-
Secondary exposure: the slider comes 26.1% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (1 pulled), 55.6% hard, 55.6% in the air, 199-ft average. Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.293 > wOBA 0.280). Weather works for him (carry ×1.37 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 26.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 32% / SL 26% / ST 24%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itFour-Seam (31.8%): struggles — an escape routeSweeper (23.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.14 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 55.6% · air 55.6% · avg 199 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.293 · wOBA 0.280rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.387 · SLG 0.330quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.37 toward his zones (LF 25% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cam Smith ⤢ full card16%PROVEN
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade C — model play only
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 155-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 2 HR, 12.7% barrels, 0.592 xSLG over 63 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.312 vs xwOBA 0.280 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.30 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (20.0%): handles itSlider (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 155 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.280 · wOBA 0.312rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.393 · SLG 0.452results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.30 toward his zones (LC 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Tim Tawa ⤢ full card16%TAKE
Arizona Diamondbacks · vs Janson Junk (righty) · lineup TBD · Chase Field
The read — grade A-
Primary-pitch exposure: the slider comes 28.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (2 in the last 5), 3 barrels (3 pulled), 50.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 204-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 3 HR, 11.5% barrels, 0.588 xSLG over 26 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 28.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SL 29% / ST 21% / FF 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (21.4%): damages itFour-Seam (17.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Victor Vodnik 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage) — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.57 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (2 in last 5) · 3 barrels (3 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 70.0% · avg 204 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 96°F · wind 3 mph · air -8.8% dense (carry +22 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.05
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jeremy Peña ⤢ full card16%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 223-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 2 HR, 4.8% barrels, 0.617 xSLG over 42 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.286 vs xwOBA 0.277 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.30 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (20.0%): damages itSlider (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 60.0% · avg 223 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.277 · wOBA 0.286rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.386 · SLG 0.389results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.30 toward his zones (LF 40% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Michael Harris II ⤢ full card15%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 49.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 50.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 161-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 4 HR, 14.8% barrels, 0.805 xSLG over 61 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.396 vs xwOBA 0.278 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 49.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 49% / FS 47%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (47.0%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.02 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 60.0% · avg 161 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.278 · wOBA 0.396rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.448 · SLG 0.521results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (CF 29% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Carter Jensen ⤢ full card15%EDGE
Kansas City Royals · vs Hunter Brown (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade A
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 29.9% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (2 pulled), 60.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 283-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 7 HR, 11.8% barrels, 0.58 xSLG over 68 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.481 vs wOBA 0.470 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.9% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 30% / SI 28% / KC 17%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (28.4%): damages itKnuckle-Curve (16.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.13 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 80.0% · avg 283 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.481 · wOBA 0.470rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.684 · SLG 0.654quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (RF 21% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Christian Walker ⤢ full card15%PROVEN
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 257-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 5 HR, 11.3% barrels, 0.599 xSLG over 71 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.285 > wOBA 0.234). Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (20.0%): damages itSlider (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 70.0% · avg 257 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.285 · wOBA 0.234rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.391 · SLG 0.280quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LF 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Lazaro Montes ⤢ full card15%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 49%
Seattle Mariners · vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the cutter comes 49.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 33.3% hard, 100.0% in the air, 324-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 49.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 49% / ST 24% / FS 22%
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 33.3% · air 100.0% · avg 324 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jordan Walker ⤢ full card15%EDGE
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR, 2 barrels, 70.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 176-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 5 HR, 13.5% barrels, 0.553 xSLG over 74 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.329 vs xwOBA 0.266 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.7% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / FF 30% / ST 28%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (33.3%): handles itSweeper (27.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈0.42 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 50.0% · avg 176 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.266 · wOBA 0.329rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.371 · SLG 0.436results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Gabriel Moreno ⤢ full card15%EDGE
Arizona Diamondbacks · vs Janson Junk (righty) · lineup TBD · Chase Field
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the slider comes 28.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 165-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.367 vs xwOBA 0.319 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 28.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SL 29% / ST 21% / FF 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (21.4%): damages itFour-Seam (17.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Victor Vodnik 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage) — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.57 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 60.0% · avg 165 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.319 · wOBA 0.367rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.401 · SLG 0.472results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 96°F · wind 3 mph · air -8.8% dense (carry +22 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.05
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Vinnie Pasquantino ⤢ full card15%EDGE
Kansas City Royals · vs Hunter Brown (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade A-
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 29.9% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 235-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 10.6% barrels, 0.528 xSLG over 94 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.383 vs wOBA 0.378 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.9% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 30% / SI 28% / KC 17%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (28.4%): damages itKnuckle-Curve (16.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.13 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 70.0% · avg 235 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.383 · wOBA 0.378rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.489 · SLG 0.506quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (CF 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Kyle Karros ⤢ full card15%PROVEN
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the cutter comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 60.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 164-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 0 HR, 5.9% barrels, 0.542 xSLG over 17 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.325 vs xwOBA 0.322 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 29.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 30% / SI 23% / SL 12%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (23.4%): handles itSlider (12.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.65 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 50.0% · avg 164 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.322 · wOBA 0.325rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.408 · SLG 0.384results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Randal Grichuk ⤢ full card15%PROVEN
Chicago White Sox · vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the changeup comes 18.8% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 70.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 129-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 23.1% barrels, 0.809 xSLG over 26 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.440 vs xwOBA 0.365 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.66 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Changeup — 18.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 38% / CH 19% / FF 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (38.1%): handles itFour-Seam (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.21 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 40.0% · avg 129 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.365 · wOBA 0.440rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.370 · SLG 0.635results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.66 toward his zones (CF 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Josue De Paula ⤢ full card15%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 100.0% in the air. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (26.6%): thin sampleSlider (19.1%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 100.0%
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Kyle Tucker ⤢ full card15%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 267-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 12.3% barrels, 0.579 xSLG over 106 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.317 > wOBA 0.307). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (26.6%): damages itSlider (19.1%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 267 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.317 · wOBA 0.307rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.367 · SLG 0.349quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jose Siri ⤢ full card14%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.2% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels, 40.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 179-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 18.8% barrels, 0.782 xSLG over 16 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.284 vs xwOBA 0.275 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.36 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / SL 30% / FS 12%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itSlider (29.7%): struggles — an escape routeSplitter (12.4%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 60.0% · avg 179 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.275 · wOBA 0.284rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.449 · SLG 0.355results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.36 toward his zones (CF 38% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Adael Amador ⤢ full card14%EDGE
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 24.5% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 20.0% hard, 30.0% in the air, 108-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 16.7% barrels, 0.507 xSLG over 12 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.5% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskCutter (32.2%): struggles — an escape routeSinker (21.0%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 30.0% · avg 108 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cole Carrigg ⤢ full card14%TAKE
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the cutter comes 32.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 216-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 32.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (24.5%): damages itSinker (21.0%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 60.0% · avg 216 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
JJ Bleday ⤢ full card14%PROVEN
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade A-
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 2 barrels (2 pulled), 70.0% hard, 90.0% in the air, 270-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 7 HR, 14.3% barrels, 0.697 xSLG over 77 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.316 vs wOBA 0.268 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FS 29% / FF 28% / CU 24%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSplitter (29.4%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (23.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.07 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 90.0% · avg 270 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.316 · wOBA 0.268rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.379 · SLG 0.322quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jake McCarthy ⤢ full card14%EDGE
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade C
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 24.5% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 230-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 5.5% barrels, 0.527 xSLG over 109 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.373 vs xwOBA 0.315 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.5% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (32.2%): handles itSinker (21.0%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 70.0% · avg 230 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.315 · wOBA 0.373rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.436 · SLG 0.444results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Heliot Ramos ⤢ full card14%PROVEN
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the slider comes 26.1% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 50.0% hard, 30.0% in the air, 102-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 6.5% barrels, 0.658 xSLG over 31 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.270 vs xwOBA 0.246 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.45 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 26.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 32% / SL 26% / ST 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (31.8%): handles itSweeper (23.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.14 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 30.0% · avg 102 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.246 · wOBA 0.270rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.377 · SLG 0.294results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.45 toward his zones (CF 31% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Isaac Paredes ⤢ full card14%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade C — model play only
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 209-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 7 HR, 8.3% barrels, 0.503 xSLG over 96 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.402 vs xwOBA 0.333 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (20.0%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (16.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 70.0% · avg 209 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.333 · wOBA 0.402rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.318 · SLG 0.443results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LF 33% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cody Bellinger ⤢ full card14%PROVEN
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade C — model play only
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 209-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 5.3% barrels, 0.532 xSLG over 76 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.372 vs xwOBA 0.290 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.45 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (42.3%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (23.3%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 60.0% · avg 209 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.290 · wOBA 0.372rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.398 · SLG 0.511results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.45 toward his zones (RC 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jo Adell ⤢ full card14%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Cleveland Guardians · vs Davis Martin (righty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 36.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 166-ft average. Charts: xwOBA 0.353 vs wOBA 0.319 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.66 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 36.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 37% / FF 22% / CU 17%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (21.5%): handles itCurve (17.2%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen shaky: Trevor Richards 6.8 — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈0.89 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 40.0% · avg 166 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.353 · wOBA 0.319rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.372 · SLG 0.378quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.66 toward his zones (CF 32% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brett Sullivan ⤢ full card14%TAKE
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 24.5% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 245-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 7.1% barrels, 0.611 xSLG over 42 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.5% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (32.2%): handles itSinker (21.0%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 70.0% · avg 245 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Lawrence Butler ⤢ full card14%EDGE
Athletics · vs Griffin Jax (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the sinker comes 22.8% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 20.0% in the air, 100-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 7.4% barrels, 0.559 xSLG over 27 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.385 vs xwOBA 0.361 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 22.8% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 25% / FF 24% / SI 23%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (24.8%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (24.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.50 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 20.0% · avg 100 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.361 · wOBA 0.385rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.420 · SLG 0.488results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jordan Lawlar ⤢ full card14%EDGE
Arizona Diamondbacks · vs Janson Junk (righty) · lineup TBD · Chase Field
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the slider comes 28.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 160-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 28.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SL 29% / ST 21% / FF 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (21.4%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (17.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Victor Vodnik 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage) — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.57 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 60.0% · avg 160 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 96°F · wind 3 mph · air -8.8% dense (carry +22 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.05
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Francisco Lindor ⤢ full card14%TAKEMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (2 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 70.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 225-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 7 HR, 11.4% barrels, 0.67 xSLG over 70 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.331 vs xwOBA 0.280 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.13 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): handles itChangeup (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (2 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 60.0% · avg 225 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.280 · wOBA 0.331rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.380 · SLG 0.495results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Moisés Ballesteros ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 43%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade A
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 42.6% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 50.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 208-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 21.4% barrels, 0.719 xSLG over 42 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.284 > wOBA 0.281). Weather works for him (carry ×1.36 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 42.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 43% / SL 28% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSlider (27.7%): handles itSplitter (18.4%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.27 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 60.0% · avg 208 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.284 · wOBA 0.281rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.329 · SLG 0.363quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.36 toward his zones (LC 17% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cole Young ⤢ full card13%EDGE
Seattle Mariners · vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the sweeper comes 23.6% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 159-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.280 vs xwOBA 0.273 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.25 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sweeper — 23.6% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 49% / ST 24% / FS 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (49.2%): handles itSplitter (21.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 40.0% · avg 159 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.273 · wOBA 0.280rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.318 · SLG 0.348results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.25 toward his zones (CF 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Freddie Freeman ⤢ full card13%PROVENMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 148-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 6 HR, 7.8% barrels, 0.641 xSLG over 103 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.454 vs wOBA 0.307 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (26.6%): handles itSlider (19.1%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 148 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.454 · wOBA 0.307rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.398 · SLG 0.345quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
John Rave ⤢ full card13%PROVEN
Kansas City Royals · vs Hunter Brown (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 29.9% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 182-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 23.5% barrels, 0.736 xSLG over 17 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.27 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.9% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 30% / SI 28% / KC 17%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itSinker (28.4%): struggles — an escape routeKnuckle-Curve (16.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.13 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 182 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.27 toward his zones (RF 42% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Austin Wells ⤢ full card13%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 70.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 206-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 9.1% barrels, 0.555 xSLG over 55 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.44 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (42.3%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (23.3%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 70.0% · avg 206 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.44 toward his zones (CF 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Michael Busch ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 59%
Chicago Cubs · vs Martín Pérez (lefty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 58.8% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 137-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 2 HR, 13.9% barrels, 0.529 xSLG over 36 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.346 vs xwOBA 0.280 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.28 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 58.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 59% / CH 24% / FC 14%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (23.8%): handles itCutter (13.8%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Dylan Lee 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.42 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 137 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.280 · wOBA 0.346rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.394 · SLG 0.435results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.28 toward his zones (CF 40% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Nolan Gorman ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 38%
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.7% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 3 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 220-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 15.6% barrels, 0.708 xSLG over 45 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.209 > wOBA 0.179). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 38% / ST 25% / SI 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (25.3%): struggles — an escape routeSinker (17.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.71 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 3 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 50.0% · avg 220 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.209 · wOBA 0.179rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.271 · SLG 0.226quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brett Baty ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 50.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 243-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 12.0% barrels, 0.633 xSLG over 92 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.344 vs xwOBA 0.330 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.21 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): damages itChangeup (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 70.0% · avg 243 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.330 · wOBA 0.344rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.491 · SLG 0.500results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Vaughn Grissom ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.2% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (2 pulled), 60.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 183-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 4 HR, 18.8% barrels, 0.743 xSLG over 32 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.335 vs xwOBA 0.246 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.41 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / SL 30% / FS 12%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itSlider (29.7%): struggles — an escape routeSplitter (12.4%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 40.0% · avg 183 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.246 · wOBA 0.335rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.371 · SLG 0.420results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.41 toward his zones (LC 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
A.J. Ewing ⤢ full card13%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 172-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 8.8% barrels, 0.611 xSLG over 68 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.318 vs xwOBA 0.259 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.17 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): struggles — an escape routeChangeup (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 172 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.259 · wOBA 0.318rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.361 · SLG 0.348results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Nolan Arenado ⤢ full card13%EDGE
Arizona Diamondbacks · vs Janson Junk (righty) · lineup TBD · Chase Field
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the slider comes 28.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 172-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Chart caution: wOBA 0.341 vs xwOBA 0.258 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 28.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SL 29% / ST 21% / FF 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (21.4%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (17.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Victor Vodnik 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage) — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.57 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 172 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.258 · wOBA 0.341rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.295 · SLG 0.472results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 96°F · wind 3 mph · air -8.8% dense (carry +22 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.05
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Ryan McMahon ⤢ full card13%PROVEN
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 28.2% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 146-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 4 HR, 13.3% barrels, 0.641 xSLG over 60 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.307 > wOBA 0.267). Weather works for him (carry ×1.32 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 28.2% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 42% / FF 28% / SL 23%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (42.3%): handles itSlider (23.3%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.64 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 146 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.307 · wOBA 0.267rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.321 · SLG 0.287quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.32 toward his zones (CF 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Yainer Diaz ⤢ full card12%PROVEN
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 50.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 206-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 3 HR, 13.3% barrels, 0.676 xSLG over 30 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.365 vs xwOBA 0.337 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (20.0%): damages itSlider (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 60.0% · avg 206 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.337 · wOBA 0.365rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.338 · SLG 0.457results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LF 37% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jose Altuve ⤢ full card12%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade C — model play only
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 186-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Chart caution: wOBA 0.322 vs xwOBA 0.257 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (20.0%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (16.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 50.0% · avg 186 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.257 · wOBA 0.322rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.306 · SLG 0.402results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LF 34% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Juan Brito ⤢ full card12%EDGE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 42.9% hard, 57.1% in the air, 214-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FS 29% / FF 28% / CU 24%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itSplitter (29.4%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (23.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.07 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 42.9% · air 57.1% · avg 214 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Hunter Feduccia ⤢ full card12%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (2 pulled), 50.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 215-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 22.5% barrels, 0.774 xSLG over 40 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (26.6%): handles itSlider (19.1%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 80.0% · avg 215 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Mike Yastrzemski ⤢ full card12%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 49.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 50.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 152-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 4 HR, 7.7% barrels, 0.526 xSLG over 78 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.350 vs wOBA 0.334 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.27 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 49.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 49% / FS 47%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSplitter (47.0%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.02 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 50.0% · avg 152 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.350 · wOBA 0.334rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.448 · SLG 0.455quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.27 toward his zones (CF 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Matt McLain ⤢ full card12%STANDOUT
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (1 pulled), 70.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 246-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 3 HR, 13.0% barrels, 0.644 xSLG over 46 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (19.8%): handles itSplitter (17.8%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 70.0% · avg 246 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Sean Murphy ⤢ full card12%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 53%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 52.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels, 60.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 157-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 7.1% barrels, 0.618 xSLG over 14 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.28 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 52.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 53% / FS 34%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSplitter (34.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.03Starter vs his hand: ≈1.68 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 50.0% · avg 157 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.28 toward his zones (LF 20% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Josh Lowe ⤢ full card12%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 43%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 42.6% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 254-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 5 HR, 17.4% barrels, 0.747 xSLG over 46 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.296 vs xwOBA 0.283 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 42.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 43% / SL 28% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSlider (27.7%): damages itSplitter (18.4%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.27 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 254 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.283 · wOBA 0.296rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.325 · SLG 0.372results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LC 22% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Troy Johnston ⤢ full card12%PROVEN
Colorado Rockies · vs Walker Buehler (righty) · lineup TBD · Coors Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 24.5% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 70.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 177-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 0 HR, 1.7% barrels, 0.581 xSLG over 58 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.314 > wOBA 0.287). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.5% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 32% / FF 24% / SI 21%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskCutter (32.2%): handles itSinker (21.0%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Bradgley Rodriguez 13.5
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.30Starter vs his hand: ≈1.19 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 50.0% · avg 177 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.314 · wOBA 0.287rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.380 · SLG 0.344quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 73°F · wind 2 mph · air -17.0% dense (carry +42 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.53
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brandon Marsh ⤢ full card11%EDGE
Philadelphia Phillies · vs Jackson Kent (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade B
Limited exposure: the four-seam comes 24.4% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 2 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 156-ft average. Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.285 > wOBA 0.266). Weather works against him — that alone drops him a tier. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.4% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / SL 29% / FF 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (33.3%): handles itSlider (28.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 40.0% · avg 156 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.285 · wOBA 0.266rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.320 · SLG 0.250quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
AGAINST him — conditions suppress his sectors (×0.76)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Richie Palacios ⤢ full card11%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 22.1% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 235-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 22.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 24% / FF 22% / CH 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (23.8%): damages itChangeup (22.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.62 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 80.0% · avg 235 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Dylan Crews ⤢ full card11%PROVENMUST-THROW 43%
Washington Nationals · vs Cristopher Sánchez (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade C — model play only
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 42.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 183-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 4.3% barrels, 0.532 xSLG over 23 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.312 vs xwOBA 0.264 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works against him — that alone drops him a tier. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 42.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 43% / CH 42% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (41.7%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (15.7%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.94 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 183 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.264 · wOBA 0.312rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.340 · SLG 0.380results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
AGAINST him — conditions suppress his sectors (×0.78)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
José Caballero ⤢ full card11%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the slider comes 26.1% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 165-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.26 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 26.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 32% / SL 26% / ST 24%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskFour-Seam (31.8%): damages itSweeper (23.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.14 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 50.0% · avg 165 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.26 toward his zones (CF 26% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Andrew Pinckney ⤢ full card11%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 43%
Washington Nationals · vs Cristopher Sánchez (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 42.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 100.0% hard, 50.0% in the air. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 42.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 43% / CH 42% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (41.7%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (15.7%): thin sample
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.94 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 100.0% · air 50.0%
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Ke'Bryan Hayes ⤢ full card11%STANDOUT
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 178-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.271 > wOBA 0.226). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (19.8%): damages itSplitter (17.8%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 60.0% · avg 178 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.271 · wOBA 0.226rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.345 · SLG 0.247quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Sean Keys ⤢ full card11%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Toronto Blue Jays · vs Drew Anderson (righty) · lineup TBD · Rogers Centre
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 0 barrels, 60.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 231-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.13 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / CH 35% / CU 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedChangeup (35.0%): handles itCurve (15.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Tyler Kinley 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.02Starter vs his hand: ≈1.17 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 70.0% · avg 231 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 71°F · wind 9 mph · air -0.6% dense (carry +2 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.19
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Liam Hicks ⤢ full card11%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 22.1% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 190-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.364 vs xwOBA 0.307 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 22.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 24% / FF 22% / CH 22%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itCutter (23.8%): struggles — an escape routeChangeup (22.1%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.62 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 60.0% · avg 190 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.307 · wOBA 0.364rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.373 · SLG 0.430results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
George Lombard Jr. ⤢ full card11%EDGE
New York Yankees · vs Bailey Ober (righty) · lineup TBD · Target Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the slider comes 26.1% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 164-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.38 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 26.1% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 32% / SL 26% / ST 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedFour-Seam (31.8%): handles itSweeper (23.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈1.14 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 50.0% · avg 164 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 70°F · wind 8 mph · air -2.2% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: RF ×1.57
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.38 toward his zones (LF 25% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jared Young ⤢ full card11%PROVENMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 40.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 224-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 11.7% barrels, 0.527 xSLG over 60 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.338 vs xwOBA 0.319 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.17 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): struggles — an escape routeChangeup (16.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 80.0% · avg 224 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.319 · wOBA 0.338rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.361 · SLG 0.426results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Donovan Walton ⤢ full card11%EDGE
Athletics · vs Griffin Jax (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade B
Limited exposure: the sinker comes 22.8% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (1 in the last 5), 3 barrels (3 pulled), 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 190-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 13.3% barrels, 0.632 xSLG over 30 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.374 vs xwOBA 0.368 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 22.8% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 25% / FF 24% / SI 23%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (24.8%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (24.1%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.50 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (1 in last 5) · 3 barrels (3 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 190 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.368 · wOBA 0.374rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.419 · SLG 0.432results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Ryan Waldschmidt ⤢ full card11%TAKE
Arizona Diamondbacks · vs Janson Junk (righty) · lineup TBD · Chase Field
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the slider comes 28.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (2 in the last 5), 2 barrels (1 pulled), 60.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 206-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 2 HR, 8.7% barrels, 0.767 xSLG over 23 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.310 vs xwOBA 0.280 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Slider — 28.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SL 29% / ST 21% / FF 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (21.4%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (17.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Victor Vodnik 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage) — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.57 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (2 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 50.0% · avg 206 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.280 · wOBA 0.310rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.320 · SLG 0.287results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 96°F · wind 3 mph · air -8.8% dense (carry +22 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.05
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jose Trevino ⤢ full card10%TAKE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade A
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 30.7% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 3 HR (2 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 30.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 250-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.26 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 30.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 31% / SI 20% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (19.8%): handles itSplitter (17.8%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.16Starter vs his hand: ≈1.08 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
3 HR (2 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 70.0% · avg 250 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.26 toward his zones (LF 33% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Nick Allen ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 30.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 179-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (20.0%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (16.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 60.0% · avg 179 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (LF 25% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Josh Naylor ⤢ full card10%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Seattle Mariners · vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the cutter comes 49.2% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 10.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 152-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 5.3% barrels, 0.501 xSLG over 38 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.329 > wOBA 0.298). Weather works for him (carry ×1.24 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 49.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 49% / ST 24% / FS 22%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (23.6%): handles itSplitter (21.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 10.0% · air 50.0% · avg 152 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.329 · wOBA 0.298rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.341 · SLG 0.330quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Christian Vázquez ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Houston Astros · vs Michael Wacha (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B+
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 139-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 28% / CH 20% / SL 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (20.0%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (16.5%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Nate Pearson 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.13Starter vs his hand: ≈2.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 139 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (CF 27% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Carson Benge ⤢ full card10%PROVENMUST-THROW 42%
New York Mets · vs Shane Baz (righty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade C — model play only
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 41.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 165-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 4.0% barrels, 0.54 xSLG over 101 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.332 vs xwOBA 0.329 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.21 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 41.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 42% / KC 32% / CH 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskKnuckle-Curve (31.5%): struggles — an escape routeChangeup (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈0.85 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 70.0% · avg 165 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.329 · wOBA 0.332rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.345 · SLG 0.396results running ahead of quality · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Alex Freeland ⤢ full card10%PROVENMUST-THROW 37%
Los Angeles Dodgers · vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade A
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 60.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 212-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 8.2% barrels, 0.653 xSLG over 49 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.279 vs wOBA 0.261 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 37% / CH 27% / SL 19%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (26.6%): struggles — an escape routeSlider (19.1%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.35 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 80.0% · avg 212 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.279 · wOBA 0.261rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.292 · SLG 0.247quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Edgar Quero ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Chicago White Sox · vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the changeup comes 18.8% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 130-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 9.5% barrels, 0.523 xSLG over 21 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.69 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Changeup — 18.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 38% / CH 19% / FF 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskCutter (38.1%): struggles — an escape routeFour-Seam (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.21 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 40.0% · avg 130 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.69 toward his zones (LF 36% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Mauricio Dubón ⤢ full card10%STANDOUT
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the splitter comes 34.5% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 44.4% hard, 33.3% in the air, 132-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.297 vs xwOBA 0.276 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.30 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Splitter — 34.5% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 53% / FS 34%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskFour-Seam (52.7%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.03Starter vs his hand: ≈1.68 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 44.4% · air 33.3% · avg 132 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.276 · wOBA 0.297rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.338 · SLG 0.333results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.30 toward his zones (LC 23% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Chase Meidroth ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Chicago White Sox · vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the changeup comes 18.8% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 10.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 125-ft average. Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.292 > wOBA 0.282). Weather works for him (carry ×1.64 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Changeup — 18.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 38% / CH 19% / FF 16%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (38.1%): damages itFour-Seam (16.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.21 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 10.0% · air 40.0% · avg 125 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.292 · wOBA 0.282rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.345 · SLG 0.318quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.64 toward his zones (LF 29% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Austin Hedges ⤢ full card10%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 37%
Cleveland Guardians · vs Davis Martin (righty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the sinker comes 36.6% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 30.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 187-ft average. Weather works for him (carry ×1.65 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 36.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 37% / FF 22% / CU 17%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskFour-Seam (21.5%): damages itCurve (17.2%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpenBullpen vulnerable: pen shaky: Trevor Richards 6.8 — with the starter leaving early, that's extra cracks at a leaking pen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈0.89 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 60.0% · avg 187 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.65 toward his zones (LF 60% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jonny DeLuca ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the cutter comes 20.3% of the time to righties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 176-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.343 vs xwOBA 0.235 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Cutter — 20.3% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: ST 32% / SI 22% / FC 20%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (31.6%): damages itSinker (21.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.50 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 176 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.235 · wOBA 0.343rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.280 · SLG 0.389results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Bryson Stott ⤢ full card10%PROVEN
Philadelphia Phillies · vs Jackson Kent (lefty) · lineup TBD · Nationals Park
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the four-seam comes 24.4% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 50.0% hard, 80.0% in the air, 250-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 0 HR, 5.3% barrels, 0.611 xSLG over 19 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.299 > wOBA 0.259). Weather works against him — that alone drops him a tier. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 24.4% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / SL 29% / FF 24%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSinker (33.3%): handles itSlider (28.9%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.00Starter vs his hand: ≈0.00 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 50.0% · air 80.0% · avg 250 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.299 · wOBA 0.259rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.358 · SLG 0.261quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 74°F · wind 6 mph · air +0.4% dense (carry -1 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.89
AGAINST him — conditions suppress his sectors (×0.76)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brandon Valenzuela ⤢ full card10%PROVENMUST-THROW 46%
Toronto Blue Jays · vs Drew Anderson (righty) · lineup TBD · Rogers Centre
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 251-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 9.3% barrels, 0.634 xSLG over 43 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.243 > wOBA 0.209). Weather works for him (carry ×1.15 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / CH 35% / CU 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (35.0%): damages itCurve (15.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Tyler Kinley 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.02Starter vs his hand: ≈1.17 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 251 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.243 · wOBA 0.209rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.267 · SLG 0.211quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
GREEN · 71°F · wind 9 mph · air -0.6% dense (carry +2 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.19
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Josh Smith ⤢ full card10%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Toronto Blue Jays · vs Drew Anderson (righty) · lineup TBD · Rogers Centre
The read — grade A-
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 2 HR (1 in the last 5), 3 barrels (2 pulled), 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 260-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 2 HR, 6.8% barrels, 0.516 xSLG over 44 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.15 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / CH 35% / CU 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (35.0%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (15.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Tyler Kinley 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.02Starter vs his hand: ≈1.17 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
2 HR (1 in last 5) · 3 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 260 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 71°F · wind 9 mph · air -0.6% dense (carry +2 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.19
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Christian Moore ⤢ full card10%PROVENMUST-THROW 46%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.2% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 40.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 199-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 1 HR, 15.0% barrels, 0.503 xSLG over 20 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.2% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / SL 30% / FS 12%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSlider (29.7%): struggles — an escape routeSplitter (12.4%): thin sample
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.79 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 70.0% · avg 199 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Cedric Mullins ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Tampa Bay Rays · vs Jack Perkins (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade C
Limited exposure: the sweeper comes 20.3% of the time to lefties — his #4 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 0 barrels, 44.4% hard, 66.7% in the air, 233-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.277 vs xwOBA 0.217 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sweeper — 20.3% to his side · his #4 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 24% / FF 22% / CH 22%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedCutter (23.8%): handles itFour-Seam (22.1%): handles itChangeup (22.1%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
short outings lately — two looks, then the bullpen
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.62 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 44.4% · air 66.7% · avg 233 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.217 · wOBA 0.277rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.365 · SLG 0.274results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brett Bateman ⤢ full card10%STANDOUTMUST-THROW 46%
Toronto Blue Jays · vs Drew Anderson (righty) · lineup TBD · Rogers Centre
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 46.5% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 30.0% hard, 20.0% in the air, 109-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 5.6% barrels, 0.598 xSLG over 18 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 46.5% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 46% / CH 35% / CU 16%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itChangeup (35.0%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (15.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Tyler Kinley 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.02Starter vs his hand: ≈1.17 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 20.0% · avg 109 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 71°F · wind 9 mph · air -0.6% dense (carry +2 ft) · best carry: RC ×1.19
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Kyle Isbel ⤢ full card10%EDGE
Kansas City Royals · vs Hunter Brown (righty) · lineup TBD · Daikin Park
The read — grade B
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 29.9% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 10.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 203-ft average. Chart caution: wOBA 0.265 vs xwOBA 0.240 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Weather works for him (carry ×1.29 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.9% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 30% / SI 28% / KC 17%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (28.4%): struggles — an escape routeKnuckle-Curve (16.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.05Starter vs his hand: ≈1.13 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 10.0% · air 50.0% · avg 203 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.240 · wOBA 0.265rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.295 · SLG 0.315results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 87°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.5% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.47
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.29 toward his zones (CF 26% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Thomas Saggese ⤢ full card10%PROVEN
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels, 70.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 178-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 0 HR, 6.7% barrels, 0.587 xSLG over 15 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.336 vs xwOBA 0.336 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.7% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / FF 30% / ST 28%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (33.3%): damages itSweeper (27.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈0.42 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 70.0% · air 60.0% · avg 178 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.336 · wOBA 0.336rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.469 · SLG 0.462results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
TJ Friedl ⤢ full card9%EDGE
Cincinnati Reds · vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · lineup TBD · Great American Ball Park
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 27.8% of the time to lefties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 146-ft average. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 27.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FS 29% / FF 28% / CU 24%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSplitter (29.4%): struggles — an escape routeCurve (23.5%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
goes deep (6.5+ IP L5) — a third look at the starter is likely
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.20Starter vs his hand: ≈1.07 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 146 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 92°F · wind 3 mph · air -5.3% dense (carry +13 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.54
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Brenton Doyle ⤢ full card9%EDGE
Chicago White Sox · vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · lineup TBD · Progressive Field
The read — grade B+
Secondary exposure: the changeup comes 18.8% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 2 barrels (2 pulled), 30.0% hard, 30.0% in the air, 103-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 13.3% barrels, 0.411 xSLG over 15 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.69 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Changeup — 18.8% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: FC 38% / CH 19% / FF 16%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskCutter (38.1%): handles itFour-Seam (16.5%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.21 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 2 barrels (2 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 30.0% · avg 103 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 81°F · wind 8 mph · air -3.7% dense (carry +9 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.81
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.69 toward his zones (LC 43% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Pedro Pagés ⤢ full card9%EDGE
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade B
Secondary exposure: the four-seam comes 29.7% of the time to righties — his #2 pitch to that side, behind the lead offering — he'll still see it every at-bat. His last 10 batted balls against it: 1 HR (1 in the last 5), 1 barrels, 30.0% hard, 70.0% in the air, 197-ft average. PROVEN SAME-SIDE hitter — he crushes this hand for real: 2 HR, 10.0% barrels, 0.712 xSLG over 20 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.26 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 29.7% to his side · his #2 pitch vs that handSide mix: SI 33% / FF 30% / ST 28%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSinker (33.3%): damages itSweeper (27.9%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈0.42 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
1 HR (1 in last 5) · 1 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 30.0% · air 70.0% · avg 197 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.26 toward his zones (LF 33% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jeremiah Jackson ⤢ full card9%PROVEN
Baltimore Orioles · vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · lineup TBD · Citi Field
The read — grade A
Primary-pitch exposure: the four-seam comes 33.8% of the time to righties — his #1 pitch to that side. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 3 barrels, 60.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 184-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 26.7% barrels, 0.74 xSLG over 15 batted balls (vs LHP specifically). Charts: xwOBA 0.281 vs wOBA 0.229 — deserved production ahead of results and rising; you're buying before the box scores catch up. Weather works for him (carry ×1.18 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 33.8% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 34% / ST 26% / CH 15%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (25.8%): handles itChangeup (15.2%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.47 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 3 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 60.0% · air 50.0% · avg 184 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.281 · wOBA 0.229rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.339 · SLG 0.286quality ahead of results ✓ · rising ↑
Weather
GREEN · 67°F · wind 6 mph · air +1.9% dense (carry -5 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.33
Mildly favorable — warm/wind-out, no strong directional story
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Bryan Torres ⤢ full card9%PROVENMUST-THROW 38%
St. Louis Cardinals · vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · lineup TBD · Busch Stadium
The read — grade C — model play only
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 37.7% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 40.0% in the air, 149-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 7.9% barrels, 0.587 xSLG over 38 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Chart caution: wOBA 0.330 vs xwOBA 0.281 — results running ahead of quality; you'd be buying at a peak. Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 37.7% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 38% / ST 25% / SI 18%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskSweeper (25.3%): struggles — an escape routeSinker (17.9%): handles it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.71 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 40.0% · avg 149 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.281 · wOBA 0.330rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.296 · SLG 0.333results running ahead of quality
Weather
NEUTRAL · 88°F · wind 8 mph · air -4.9% dense (carry +12 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.41
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Dominic Smith ⤢ full card9%PROVENMUST-THROW 49%
Atlanta Braves · vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · lineup TBD · Wrigley Field
The read — grade B
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 49.0% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 20.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 169-ft average. That reaction is the weak link — he ranks on the model, not the pitch matchup. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 3 HR, 8.8% barrels, 0.626 xSLG over 68 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.27 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 49.0% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 49% / FS 47%
Can he be pitched around?
NO ESCAPE — he handles the rest of the arsenal; the vulnerable pitch cannot be shelvedSplitter (47.0%): damages it
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×1.07Starter vs his hand: ≈1.02 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 20.0% · air 50.0% · avg 169 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 5 mph · air -2.4% dense (carry +6 ft) · best carry: LC ×1.39
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.27 toward his zones (RF 19% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Jonah Heim ⤢ full card9%PROVEN
Athletics · vs Griffin Jax (righty) · lineup TBD · Tropicana Field
The read — grade B
Limited exposure: the sinker comes 22.8% of the time to lefties — his #3 pitch to that side — the matchup depends on him getting it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 0 barrels, 40.0% hard, 60.0% in the air, 171-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 5.3% barrels, 0.558 xSLG over 19 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Charts lean his way (xwOBA 0.294 > wOBA 0.238). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Sinker — 22.8% to his side · his #3 pitch vs that handSide mix: CH 25% / FF 24% / SI 23%
Can he be pitched around?
One escape route — partial pitch-around riskChangeup (24.8%): handles itFour-Seam (24.1%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looks
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.95Starter vs his hand: ≈1.50 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 0 barrels (0 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 60.0% · avg 171 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
rolling 100 PA — xwOBA 0.294 · wOBA 0.238rolling 100 PA — xSLG 0.298 · SLG 0.272quality ahead of results ✓
Weather
NEUTRAL · 80°F · wind 3 mph · air -2.1% dense (carry +5 ft) · best carry: LF ×0.95
Neutral conditions
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Adam Frazier ⤢ full card7%PROVENMUST-THROW 43%
Los Angeles Angels · vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · lineup TBD · Angel Stadium
The read — grade B+
Maximum exposure: the four-seam comes 42.6% of the time to lefties — his #1 pitch to that side; he cannot avoid it. His last 10 batted balls against it: 0 HR, 1 barrels (1 pulled), 40.0% hard, 50.0% in the air, 163-ft average. Season body of work vs the pitch type says he handles it: 1 HR, 9.7% barrels, 0.572 xSLG over 31 batted balls (vs RHP specifically). Weather works for him (carry ×1.31 toward his zones). Lineup not posted yet.
The pitch — exposure
Four-Seam — 42.6% to his side · his #1 pitch vs that handSide mix: FF 43% / SL 28% / FS 18%
Can he be pitched around?
PITCH-AROUND RISK — two escape routes; a flat mix means he may never see itSlider (27.7%): struggles — an escape routeSplitter (18.4%): struggles — an escape route
Starter depth & bullpen
normal length — two, sometimes three looksBullpen vulnerable: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
Park & pitcher, by his hand
Park for his side: ×0.98Starter vs his hand: ≈1.27 HR/9 allowed
His reaction (last 10 batted balls vs it)
0 HR (0 in last 5) · 1 barrels (1 pulled) · hard 40.0% · air 50.0% · avg 163 ft
Quality charts (rolling 100 PA)
results running ahead of quality
Weather
GREEN · 72°F · wind 9 mph · air -1.2% dense (carry +3 ft) · best carry: LF ×1.60
IN HIS FAVOR — carry ×1.31 toward his zones (RC 40% of his damage)
Directional/spray reads are context (physics-sound, not yet validated predictors — see methodology §6); the RED veto is proven.
Slips Tuesday, September 15, 2026
The vetted selections — every batter audited against the starter's top-2 pitches (hand-conditioned, samples stated), disqualified only by his own data. Tap a batter for his full pros & cons and his pitcher's. Built 6:02 AM ET.
BEST BAT EACH SIDE, PICKED BY THE METHOD (model shown, not voting):Braves: L—Drake Baldwin (17%) / R—Ronald Acuña Jr. (18%) · Orioles: R—Pete Alonso (21%) · Cubs: L—Pete Crow-Armstrong (19%) · Sox: R—Miguel Vargas (18%) ⚠thin · Reds: R—Elly De La Cruz (23%) · Rockies: L—Mickey Moniak (17%) / R—Hunter Goodman (18%) · Royals: L—Jac Caglianone (17%) · Angels: R—Zach Neto (19%) · Dodgers: L—Max Muncy (22%) · Mets: L—Juan Soto (19%) ⚠thin · Yankees: L—Spencer Jones (21%) / R—Aaron Judge (22%) · Phillies: L—Kyle Schwarber (20%) · Padres: L—Jackson Merrill (17%) · Mariners: L—Dominic Canzone (18%) / R—Cal Raleigh (17%) · Cardinals: R—Leo Bernal (21%) · Rays: L—Victor Mesa Jr. (16%) / R—Junior Caminero (21%)
Removed by their own data: Nelson Velázquez (same-side, no vs-RHP proof (2 HR/43 PA vs that hand))
☆ Ben Rice⤢ full card24%
vs Bailey Ober (righty) · Target Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.1% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Changeup (42.3%, his #1): season x0.585, 3 HR (52 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (28.2%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 2 brl, 70.0% hard · season x1.157, 13 HR (65 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.505 SLG / 0.529 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.236 (551 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 29 HR in 426 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (28.2%): 0 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.1 IP/start (5.0 even in his 14 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.64 → L10 0.55 → L5 0.66 → L3 0.0 → last 0.0
☆ Matt Olson⤢ full card24%
vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · Wrigley Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.8% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (49.0%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 70.0% hard · season x0.879, 11 HR (85 BBE, vs RHP)
Under-earning: xSLG 0.46 above 0.336 SLG — buy signal
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.251 (603 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 26 HR in 400 PA
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Splitter (47.0%): 0 HR/1 brl L10, season x0.519 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (49.0%): 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.02 → L10 1.25 → L5 1.16 → L3 1.06 → last 3.82
Stays in games: 5.4 IP/start (5.3 even in his 18 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
L3 starts: 10.9% barrels allowed, HR/9 3.14
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
☆ Elly De La Cruz⤢ full card23%
vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · Great American Ball Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (27.8%, his #2): L10 trail: 3 HR, 6 brl, 100.0% hard · season x0.867, 8 HR (88 BBE, vs RHP)
In form: L30 0.612 SLG / 0.606 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.211 (538 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Zone collision spike (2.7): his damage zones meet this delivery
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Splitter (29.4%): 0 HR/0 brl L10, season x0.387 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 28% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Splitter vs LHB (29.4%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 10 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (27.8%): 2 HR, 2 brl on 7 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.07 → L10 0.99 → L5 1.49 → L3 2.49 → last 2.25
Stays in games: 6.3 IP/start (6.5 even in his 15 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
L3 starts: 11.4% barrels allowed, HR/9 2.04
Pitcher — why he survives
Strikeout arm: 26.4% K, 25.0% whiff — can escape via K
Max Muncy⤢ full card22%
vs Rhett Lowder (righty) · Great American Ball Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.8% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (37.0%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 2 brl, 70.0% hard · season x0.814, 9 HR (82 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Changeup (26.6%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 50.0% hard · season x0.466, 3 HR (58 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.512 SLG / 0.452 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.220 (467 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 23 HR in 411 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (37.0%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE last 3 starts, drift +10pp
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: Luis Mey 36.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
L3 starts: 13.0% barrels allowed, HR/9 1.21
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.35 → L10 1.11 → L5 0.61 → L3 1.01 → last 0.0
Aaron Judge⤢ full card22%
vs Bailey Ober (righty) · Target Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 17.3% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (31.8%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 3 brl, 70.0% hard · season x1.074, 2 HR (19 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Slider (26.1%, his #2): L10 trail: 0 HR, 2 brl, 60.0% hard · season x0.655, 1 HR (17 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.304 (243 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Zone collision spike (3.0): his damage zones meet this delivery
Vs RHP overall: 13 HR in 207 PA
Batter — the case against
Form is earned-cold (L30 0.333/0.346x) — kept on the board ONLY by his converter exemption
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 31% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Slider vs RHB (26.1%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 8 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.1 IP/start (5.0 even in his 14 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.14 → L10 1.96 → L5 2.25 → L3 1.59 → last 0.0
☆ Spencer Jones⤢ full card21%
vs Bailey Ober (righty) · Target Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 11.7% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Changeup (42.3%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 2 brl, 40.0% hard · season x0.713, 3 HR (15 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (28.2%, his #2): L10 trail: 2 HR, 5 brl, 80.0% hard · season x0.706, 2 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.511 SLG / 0.499 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.199 (227 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 36% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (28.2%): 0 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.1 IP/start (5.0 even in his 14 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.64 → L10 0.55 → L5 0.66 → L3 0.0 → last 0.0
☆ Pete Alonso⤢ full card21%
vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · Citi Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (33.8%, his #1): L10 trail: 0 HR, 2 brl, 70.0% hard · season x0.764, 1 HR (46 BBE, vs LHP)
Weapon vs the Sweeper (25.8%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 71.4% hard
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.57 SLG / 0.564 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.247 (584 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Zone collision spike (3.0): his damage zones meet this delivery
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (33.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 16 BBE last 3 starts, drift -9pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs RHB (25.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.47 → L10 1.68 → L5 2.29 → L3 1.23 → last 0.0
Leo Bernal⤢ full card21%
vs Blade Tidwell (righty) · Busch Stadium · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (37.7%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 50.0% hard
In form: L30 0.558 SLG / 0.577 xSLG — earned
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Sweeper (25.3%): no trail — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (37.7%): 2 HR, 2 brl on 9 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs LHB (25.3%): 0 HR, 2 brl on 3 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.71 → L10 1.5 → L5 2.28 → L3 3.02 → last 3.19
L3 starts: 18.2% barrels allowed, HR/9 2.32
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
Luis García Jr.⤢ full card21%
vs Bailey Ober (righty) · Target Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 10.7% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Changeup (42.3%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 1 brl, 50.0% hard · season x0.552, 7 HR (71 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (28.2%, his #2): L10 trail: 0 HR, 2 brl, 60.0% hard · season x0.685, 5 HR (82 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.548 SLG / 0.541 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.212 (506 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 27 HR in 444 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (28.2%): 0 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.1 IP/start (5.0 even in his 14 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: A.J. Minter 19.3 ERA L5d
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.64 → L10 0.55 → L5 0.66 → L3 0.0 → last 0.0
Coby Mayo⤢ full card21%
vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · Citi Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.0% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (33.8%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 60.0% hard · season x1.121, 5 HR (28 BBE, vs LHP)
In form: L30 0.567 SLG / 0.616 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.224 (386 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs LHP overall: 17 HR in 156 PA
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Sweeper (25.8%): 0 HR/1 brl L10, season x0.582 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (33.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 16 BBE last 3 starts, drift -9pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs RHB (25.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.47 → L10 1.68 → L5 2.29 → L3 1.23 → last 0.0
Junior Caminero⤢ full card21%
vs Jack Perkins (righty) · Tropicana Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 11.1% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Sweeper (31.6%, his #1): season x0.576, 4 HR (42 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sinker (21.5%, his #2): season x0.518, 7 HR (91 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Cutter (20.3%, his #3, the Edge-flagged pitch): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 20.0% hard · season x0.586, 3 HR (31 BBE, vs RHP)
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Sweepers in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.216 (583 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 32 HR in 494 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs RHB (20.3%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 2 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs RHB trending WORSE: szn 1.5 → L10 1.25 → L5 1.7 → L3 1.74 → last 4.25
Pitcher — why he survives
Short outings (4.4 IP/start): fewer looks at him (pen exposure instead)
Kyle Schwarber⤢ full card20%
vs Jackson Kent (lefty) · Nationals Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 17.1% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Sinker (33.3%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 50.0% hard · season x0.846, 6 HR (52 BBE, vs LHP)
Weapon vs the Slider (28.9%, his #2): season x0.59, 0 HR (17 BBE, vs LHP)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (24.4%, his #3, the Edge-flagged pitch): season x0.81, 5 HR (33 BBE, vs LHP)
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes LHP Sinkers in vs-hand data
Under-earning: xSLG 0.48 above 0.413 SLG — buy signal
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.255 (551 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Zone collision spike (2.6): his damage zones meet this delivery
Vs LHP overall: 15 HR in 242 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 28% vs LHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (24.4%): 0 HR, 2 brl on 3 BBE last 3 starts, drift -11pp
Short outings (4.3 IP/start): fewer looks at him (pen exposure instead)
Season stinginess: 0.3 HR/9, 8.1% barrels allowed
Mike Trout⤢ full card20%
vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · Angel Stadium · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (46.2%, his #1): season x0.699, 6 HR (95 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Slider (29.7%, his #2): season x0.862, 1 HR (22 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.228 (487 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
SP_HR_PRONE flag (info): prone-SP picks hit ~9-13% historically; better vs stay-in arms
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (46.2%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Slider vs RHB (29.7%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 7 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.7 IP/start (5.6 even in his 16 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
L3 starts: 12.8% barrels allowed, HR/9 3.19
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.79 → L10 2.97 → L5 4.17 → L3 4.25 → last 0.0
Strikeout arm: 27.1% K, 27.7% whiff — can escape via K
Pete Crow-Armstrong⤢ full card19%
vs Martín Pérez (lefty) · Wrigley Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 13.8% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Sinker (58.8%, his #1): season x0.523, 0 HR (34 BBE, vs LHP)
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes LHP Sinkers in vs-hand data
In form: L30 0.718 SLG / 0.675 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.241 (590 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs LHP overall: 11 HR in 219 PA
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Changeup (23.8%): 1 HR/1 brl L10, season x1.912 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Sinker vs LHB (58.8%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: Dylan Lee 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.42 → L10 1.27 → L5 2.12 → L3 1.59 → last 0.0
Season stinginess: 0.88 HR/9, 5.2% barrels allowed
Zach Neto⤢ full card19%
vs Logan Gilbert (righty) · Angel Stadium · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 10.3% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (46.2%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 30.0% hard · season x0.694, 6 HR (66 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Slider (29.7%, his #2): season x0.516, 2 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
In form: L30 0.579 SLG / 0.517 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.191 (592 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 33% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
SP_HR_PRONE flag (info): prone-SP picks hit ~9-13% historically; better vs stay-in arms
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (46.2%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Slider vs RHB (29.7%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 7 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.7 IP/start (5.6 even in his 16 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen exploitable: Carlos Vargas 9.0 (light usage)
L3 starts: 12.8% barrels allowed, HR/9 3.19
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.79 → L10 2.97 → L5 4.17 → L3 4.25 → last 0.0
Strikeout arm: 27.1% K, 27.7% whiff — can escape via K
Juan Soto⤢ full card19%
vs Shane Baz (righty) · Citi Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (41.5%, his #1): season x1.035, 7 HR (54 BBE, vs RHP)
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.275 (360 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 20 HR in 295 PA
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Knuckle-Curve (31.5%): 0 HR/0 brl L10, season x0.725 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (41.5%): 3 HR, 4 brl on 17 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 0.85 → L10 1.2 → L5 1.74 → L3 2.12 → last 3.33
Stays in games: 5.6 IP/start (5.8 even in his 13 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Four-Seam velo down 0.8 mph vs season (95.1) — stuff fading
Pitcher — why he survives
Season stinginess: 0.72 HR/9, 6.8% barrels allowed
Hunter Goodman⤢ full card18%
vs Walker Buehler (righty) · Coors Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.9% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Cutter (29.7%, his #1): season x0.541, 1 HR (24 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sinker (23.4%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 50.0% hard · season x0.577, 3 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Cutters in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.217 (504 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 28 HR in 377 PA
Batter — the case against
Over-earning: SLG 0.456 vs xSLG 0.372 — results ahead of contact
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 29% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
COLD flag (info only — his x-stats don't confirm a true slump)
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs RHB (29.7%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 4 BBE last 3 starts, drift +11pp
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.65 → L10 0.99 → L5 1.06 → L3 2.25 → last 0.0
Short outings (4.5 IP/start): fewer looks at him (pen exposure instead)
Christian Encarnacion-Strand⤢ full card18%
vs Sean Manaea (lefty) · Citi Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (33.8%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 3 brl, 60.0% hard · season x1.281, 3 HR (14 BBE, vs LHP)
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.246 (164 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs LHP overall: 6 HR in 69 PA
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Sweeper (25.8%): 0 HR/0 brl L10, season x0.769 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 30% vs LHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (33.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 16 BBE last 3 starts, drift -9pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs RHB (25.8%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 11 BBE last 3 starts
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.47 → L10 1.68 → L5 2.29 → L3 1.23 → last 0.0
Dominic Canzone⤢ full card18%
vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · Angel Stadium · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 10.2% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Cutter (49.2%, his #1): season x0.761, 2 HR (23 BBE, vs RHP)
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.207 (449 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Sweeper (23.6%): 0 HR/0 brl L10, season x0.297 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs LHB (49.2%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE last 3 starts, drift +12pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs LHB (23.6%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts, drift +9pp
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.79 → L10 2.09 → L5 1.62 → L3 1.74 → last 5.46
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
Ronald Acuña Jr.⤢ full card18%
vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · Wrigley Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (52.7%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 50.0% hard · season x0.573, 1 HR (66 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Splitter (34.5%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 28.6% hard
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.216 (379 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (52.7%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 17 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Splitter vs RHB (34.5%): 4 HR, 4 brl on 6 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs RHB trending WORSE: szn 1.68 → L10 1.68 → L5 3.68 → L3 5.17 → last 5.88
Stays in games: 5.4 IP/start (5.3 even in his 18 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
L3 starts: 10.9% barrels allowed, HR/9 3.14
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
☆ Miguel Vargas⤢ full card18%
vs Foster Griffin (lefty) · Progressive Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Cutter (38.1%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 2 brl, 50.0% hard
Weapon vs the Changeup (18.8%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 70.0% hard · season x0.622, 1 HR (32 BBE, vs LHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.232 (566 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs LHP overall: 12 HR in 194 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Changeup vs RHB (18.8%): 0 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.3 IP/start (5.2 even in his 16 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.21 → L10 0.67 → L5 0.0 → L3 0.0 → last 0.0
Jackson Merrill⤢ full card17%
vs Kyle Freeland (lefty) · Coors Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Sinker (31.2%, his #1): season x0.584, 1 HR (30 BBE, vs LHP)
Weapon vs the Cutter (23.7%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 57.1% hard
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes LHP Sinkers in vs-hand data
In form: L30 0.533 SLG / 0.589 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.217 (586 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs LHB (23.7%): 1 HR, 2 brl on 6 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.2 IP/start (5.2 even in his 15 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Sinker velo down 0.6 mph vs season (90.7) — stuff fading
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 0.72 → L10 0.83 → L5 0.83 → L3 1.53 → last 0.0
Drake Baldwin⤢ full card17%
vs Kevin Gausman (righty) · Wrigley Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (49.0%, his #1): season x0.705, 4 HR (73 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Splitter (47.0%, his #2): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 40.0% hard · season x0.798, 2 HR (17 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.206 (523 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (49.0%): 1 HR, 0 brl on 12 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.02 → L10 1.25 → L5 1.16 → L3 1.06 → last 3.82
Stays in games: 5.4 IP/start (5.3 even in his 18 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Bullpen behind him: pen exploitable: Javier Assad 9.0 (light usage)
L3 starts: 10.9% barrels allowed, HR/9 3.14
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
Jac Caglianone⤢ full card17%
vs Hunter Brown (righty) · Daikin Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 10.1% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (29.9%, his #1): season x0.852, 5 HR (61 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sinker (28.4%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 80.0% hard · season x0.727, 1 HR (23 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
In form: L30 0.521 SLG / 0.47 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.219 (485 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Zone collision spike (2.5): his damage zones meet this delivery
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
COLD flag (info only — his x-stats don't confirm a true slump)
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (29.9%): 0 HR, 1 brl on 4 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 5.0 IP/start (4.7 even in his 10 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs LHB tightening: szn 1.13 → L10 1.07 → L5 0.53 → L3 0.0 → last 0.0
Strikeout arm: 26.0% K, 24.3% whiff — can escape via K
Eugenio Suárez⤢ full card17%
vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · Great American Ball Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (30.7%, his #1): L10 trail: 4 HR, 4 brl, 70.0% hard · season x0.856, 10 HR (49 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sinker (19.8%, his #2): L10 trail: 1 HR, 2 brl, 20.0% hard
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.164 (412 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 18 HR in 348 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 33% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (30.7%): 0 HR, 0 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts, drift +8pp
VULNERABLE Sinker vs RHB (19.8%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 4 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 6.3 IP/start (6.5 even in his 15 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
L3 starts: 11.4% barrels allowed, HR/9 2.04
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.08 → L10 1.44 → L5 0.8 → L3 1.32 → last 0.0
Strikeout arm: 26.4% K, 25.0% whiff — can escape via K
Mickey Moniak⤢ full card17%
vs Walker Buehler (righty) · Coors Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.7% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Cutter (32.2%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 0 brl, 20.0% hard
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (24.5%, his #2): season x0.729, 8 HR (66 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.168 (392 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 19 HR in 334 PA
Batter — the case against
Form is earned-cold (L30 0.292/0.267x) — kept on the board ONLY by his converter exemption
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs LHB (32.2%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 6 BBE last 3 starts
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (24.5%): 0 HR, 0 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.19 → L10 1.54 → L5 2.73 → L3 3.38 → last 6.37
Short outings (4.5 IP/start): fewer looks at him (pen exposure instead)
Cal Raleigh⤢ full card17%
vs Ryan Johnson (righty) · Angel Stadium · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.6% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Cutter (49.2%, his #1): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 30.0% hard · season x0.604, 3 HR (24 BBE, vs RHP)
In form: L30 0.634 SLG / 0.519 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.203 (430 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
Soft vs the Sweeper (23.6%): 0 HR/1 brl L10, season x0.464 — his escape route
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Strikes out 29% vs RHP — one look may die on Ks
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Cutter vs LHB (49.2%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 13 BBE last 3 starts, drift +12pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs LHB (23.6%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts, drift +9pp
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.79 → L10 2.09 → L5 1.62 → L3 1.74 → last 5.46
Bullpen behind him: pen critical: Luke Murphy 18.0 ERA L5d (light usage)
Pitcher — why he survives
nothing notable
Victor Mesa Jr.⤢ full card16%
vs Jack Perkins (righty) · Tropicana Field · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
ELITE MEATBALL CONVERTER: 12.5% of his heart-zone contact leaves the yard (league ~5.8) — validated to stay dangerous through cold spells (14.5-18.7% cell)
Weapon vs the Cutter (23.8%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 50.0% hard
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (22.1%, his #2): L10 trail: 2 HR, 2 brl, 60.0% hard · season x0.624, 5 HR (46 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sweeper (20.3%, his #4, the Edge-flagged pitch): L10 trail: 1 HR, 0 brl, 50.0% hard
In form: L30 0.75 SLG / 0.51 xSLG — earned
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.196 (199 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Vs RHP overall: 12 HR in 174 PA
Batter — the case against
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs LHB (22.1%): 0 HR, 0 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts, drift -8pp
VULNERABLE Sweeper vs LHB (20.3%): 2 HR, 1 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts
HR/9 vs LHB trending WORSE: szn 1.62 → L10 2.29 → L5 1.47 → L3 1.91 → last 3.19
Pitcher — why he survives
Short outings (4.4 IP/start): fewer looks at him (pen exposure instead)
Sal Stewart QUIET⤢ full card19%
vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto (righty) · Great American Ball Park · lineup TBD
Batter — the case for
Weapon vs the Four-Seam (30.7%, his #1): L10 trail: 1 HR, 1 brl, 60.0% hard · season x0.829, 7 HR (56 BBE, vs RHP)
Weapon vs the Sinker (19.8%, his #2): season x0.599, 6 HR (93 BBE, vs RHP)
No escape: weapons against both of his top two pitches
PROVEN SAME-SIDE: crushes RHP Four-Seams in vs-hand data
POWER-PROVEN xISO 0.205 (595 AB) — value cohort at this level hit 13.5% vs 10.3% below
Batter — the case against
QUALITY-QUIET: L14 barrels 5.0% vs 12.5% norm, 0 HR L14 — barrels down AND production absent (refined 9/5); demoted
Lineup slot not confirmed yet
COLD flag (info only — his x-stats don't confirm a true slump)
Pitcher — why he gets taken deep
VULNERABLE Four-Seam vs RHB (30.7%): 0 HR, 0 brl on 5 BBE last 3 starts, drift +8pp
VULNERABLE Sinker vs RHB (19.8%): 1 HR, 1 brl on 4 BBE last 3 starts
Stays in games: 6.3 IP/start (6.5 even in his 15 HR starts) — the exposure repeats
L3 starts: 11.4% barrels allowed, HR/9 2.04
Pitcher — why he survives
HR/9 vs RHB tightening: szn 1.08 → L10 1.44 → L5 0.8 → L3 1.32 → last 0.0
Strikeout arm: 26.4% K, 25.0% whiff — can escape via K
DEEP SCAN — every layer, every confirmed batter. Tap a game, then a batter. Each line is labeled with the prop it informs.
COLLISION BOARD slot-blind top 25 — who he is x what he'll see
Angels v Logan Gilbert (14 bats)0. Zach Neto (R)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 3.18Model composite (chance rating): 16.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.65Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 21 HR, 0.699 xSLG, 13% barrels on 232 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 10 HR, 0.580 xSLG, 10% barrels on 162 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.221Batting average last 30 days: 0.252
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 33.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Mike Trout (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.41Model composite (chance rating): 17.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 21 HR, 0.761 xSLG, 18% barrels on 210 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.789 xSLG, 19% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 1HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.231Batting average last 30 days: 0.219
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Jose Siri (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.84Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 14.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 6 HR, 0.945 xSLG, 20% barrels on 56 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 4 HR, 0.683 xSLG, 12% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Moisés Ballesteros (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 6 HR, 0.774 xSLG, 19% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.325 xSLG, 0% barrels on 27 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.223Batting average last 30 days: 0.173
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 22.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Vaughn Grissom (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.53Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 4 HR, 0.710 xSLG, 17% barrels on 47 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.462 xSLG, 4% barrels on 45 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.242Batting average last 30 days: 0.23
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 12Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Josh Lowe (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.06Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 12 HR, 0.695 xSLG, 13% barrels on 167 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.655 xSLG, 15% barrels on 60 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.227Batting average last 30 days: 0.217
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 28.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 6Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Kyren Paris (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 3 HR, 0.769 xSLG, 17% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (27% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Denzer Guzman (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.69Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 2 HR, 0.642 xSLG, 13% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.351 xSLG, 4% barrels on 26 batted balls, 2024–260. Christian Moore (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 4 HR, 0.642 xSLG, 14% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.305 xSLG, 0% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.143Batting average last 30 days: 0.159
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 34.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Oswald Peraza (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.75Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 2 HR, 0.410 xSLG, 7% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.501 xSLG, 6% barrels on 49 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Travis d'Arnaud (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 41% of the time): 3 HR, 0.578 xSLG, 10% barrels on 87 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 27% of the time): 5 HR, 0.702 xSLG, 16% barrels on 44 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Wade Meckler (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.57Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 1 HR, 0.484 xSLG, 2% barrels on 66 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (23% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.313Batting average last 30 days: 0.282
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Tyler Heineman (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.08Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 2 HR, 0.465 xSLG, 4% barrels on 50 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (23% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.186Batting average last 30 days: 0.175
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Adam Frazier (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 5 HR, 0.452 xSLG, 4% barrels on 185 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.415 xSLG, 0% barrels on 75 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.24Batting average last 30 days: 0.323
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 29.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 8Triples vs RHP this season: 1Astros v Michael Wacha (14 bats)0. Yordan Alvarez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 18.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.87Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 13.0%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 10 HR, 0.792 xSLG, 15% barrels on 118 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 31% of the time): 16 HR, 0.730 xSLG, 13% barrels on 222 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.27Batting average last 30 days: 0.264
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 15.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 5.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Nelson Velázquez (R)REMOVED — same-side, no vs-RHP proof (2 HR/43 PA vs that hand)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 17.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.4Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 3 HR, 0.965 xSLG, 17% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.701 xSLG, 17% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.197Batting average last 30 days: 0.143
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 29.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Cam Smith (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.35Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.0%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 0 HR, 0.430 xSLG, 3% barrels on 164 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 5 HR, 0.588 xSLG, 9% barrels on 100 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.2Batting average last 30 days: 0.186
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 23.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 20. Jeremy Peña (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.29Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.6%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 6 HR, 0.456 xSLG, 5% barrels on 261 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 10 HR, 0.630 xSLG, 8% barrels on 183 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/5 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.256Batting average last 30 days: 0.176
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 24.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 4Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Christian Walker (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.74Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.3%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 10 HR, 0.571 xSLG, 10% barrels on 252 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 20 HR, 0.749 xSLG, 16% barrels on 205 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/8 1HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.229Batting average last 30 days: 0.189
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 19.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 12.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Isaac Paredes (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 10 HR, 0.438 xSLG, 5% barrels on 221 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 17 HR, 0.501 xSLG, 7% barrels on 274 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/9 1HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.283Batting average last 30 days: 0.293
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 14.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 9Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Yainer Diaz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.42Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.6%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.499 xSLG, 6% barrels on 216 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 9 HR, 0.665 xSLG, 11% barrels on 143 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 0K0. Jose Altuve (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.44Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.7%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.397 xSLG, 3% barrels on 233 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 20 HR, 0.594 xSLG, 11% barrels on 243 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.263Batting average last 30 days: 0.247
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 20.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Taylor Trammell (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.57Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.2%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.382 xSLG, 6% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 31% of the time): 4 HR, 0.651 xSLG, 13% barrels on 85 batted balls, 2024–260. Nick Allen (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.09Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.366 xSLG, 1% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 1 HR, 0.307 xSLG, 0% barrels on 82 batted balls, 2024–260. Christian Vázquez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.03Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.2%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 23% of the time): 2 HR, 0.383 xSLG, 3% barrels on 98 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 6 HR, 0.423 xSLG, 4% barrels on 141 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/4 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.218Batting average last 30 days: 0.161
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 17.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 6.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 4Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Daulton Varsho (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.48Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 9 HR, 0.642 xSLG, 10% barrels on 105 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 31% of the time): 18 HR, 0.634 xSLG, 14% barrels on 213 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/8 0HR 4K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.239Batting average last 30 days: 0.175
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 19.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 4.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 10. LaMonte Wade Jr. (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.1%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.509 xSLG, 11% barrels on 66 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 31% of the time): 4 HR, 0.530 xSLG, 6% barrels on 159 batted balls, 2024–260. Jorge Barrosa (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.604 xSLG, 7% barrels on 15 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 31% of the time): 0 HR, 0.281 xSLG, 0% barrels on 47 batted balls, 2024–26Athletics v Griffin Jax (14 bats)0. Shea Langeliers (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.19Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.5%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 40% of the time): 8 HR, 0.500 xSLG, 9% barrels on 91 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 10 HR, 0.584 xSLG, 11% barrels on 171 batted balls, 2024–260. Lawrence Butler (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.0%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 29% of the time): 5 HR, 0.463 xSLG, 6% barrels on 169 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 14 HR, 0.631 xSLG, 11% barrels on 253 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Zack Gelof (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.0%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 40% of the time): 4 HR, 0.577 xSLG, 12% barrels on 59 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.401 xSLG, 2% barrels on 131 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Max Muncy (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.1Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.9%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.384 xSLG, 3% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.310 xSLG, 4% barrels on 69 batted balls, 2024–260. Donovan Walton (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.43Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.4%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 29% of the time): 0 HR, 0.386 xSLG, 0% barrels on 27 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 2 HR, 0.512 xSLG, 7% barrels on 46 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Michael Stefanic (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sweeper (40% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.285 xSLG, 0% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–260. Brian Serven (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.39Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.1%vs the Sweeper (40% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (33% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Henry Bolte (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.12Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.695 xSLG, 9% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.308 xSLG, 0% barrels on 67 batted balls, 2024–260. Carlos Cortes (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.31Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.6%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 29% of the time): 1 HR, 0.372 xSLG, 8% barrels on 53 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 4 HR, 0.528 xSLG, 8% barrels on 85 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Jonah Heim (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.71Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.9%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 29% of the time): 3 HR, 0.349 xSLG, 4% barrels on 113 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 1 HR, 0.420 xSLG, 4% barrels on 258 batted balls, 2024–260. Jeff McNeil (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.9%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 29% of the time): 5 HR, 0.430 xSLG, 3% barrels on 107 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 15 HR, 0.476 xSLG, 5% barrels on 318 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Tommy White (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.66Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.1%vs the Sweeper (40% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.369 xSLG, 7% barrels on 27 batted balls, 2024–260. Alika Williams (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.09Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Sweeper (40% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.373 xSLG, 5% barrels on 44 batted balls, 2024–260. Denzel Clarke (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.13vs the Sweeper (40% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.440 xSLG, 4% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1KBraves v Kevin Gausman (13 bats)0. Ronald Acuña Jr. (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 3.3Model composite (chance rating): 15.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.74Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 8 HR, 0.700 xSLG, 15% barrels on 141 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (32% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.262Batting average last 30 days: 0.266
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 22.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Drake Baldwin (L)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 3.08Model composite (chance rating): 15.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 10 HR, 0.685 xSLG, 15% barrels on 143 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 3 HR, 0.628 xSLG, 9% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.303Batting average last 30 days: 0.293
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 21.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 12Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Matt Olson (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.98Model composite (chance rating): 20.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.88Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 25 HR, 0.767 xSLG, 18% barrels on 305 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 2 HR, 0.656 xSLG, 18% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/9 2HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.251Batting average last 30 days: 0.183
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 19Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Austin Riley (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 10 HR, 0.685 xSLG, 17% barrels on 192 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 32% of the time): 3 HR, 0.932 xSLG, 26% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/6 1HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.215Batting average last 30 days: 0.237
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 30.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 14Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Michael Harris II (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.69Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 10 HR, 0.686 xSLG, 14% barrels on 243 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 3 HR, 0.584 xSLG, 12% barrels on 40 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/9 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.302Batting average last 30 days: 0.317
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Mike Yastrzemski (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 20 HR, 0.606 xSLG, 13% barrels on 305 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 1 HR, 0.357 xSLG, 0% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/9 1HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.236Batting average last 30 days: 0.2
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Sean Murphy (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 4 HR, 0.731 xSLG, 13% barrels on 76 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (32% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.267Batting average last 30 days: 0.28
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 37.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Brewer Hicklen (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (50% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Splitter (32% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Mauricio Dubón (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.49Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 1 HR, 0.390 xSLG, 2% barrels on 205 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 32% of the time): 1 HR, 0.376 xSLG, 8% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.282Batting average last 30 days: 0.304
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Dominic Smith (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.62Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 6 HR, 0.596 xSLG, 9% barrels on 160 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 1 HR, 0.377 xSLG, 6% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/9 0HR 2K0. Ha-Seong Kim (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 5 HR, 0.487 xSLG, 7% barrels on 97 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (32% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Ozzie Albies (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.11Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 52% of the time): 16 HR, 0.509 xSLG, 9% barrels on 254 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 44% of the time): 1 HR, 0.378 xSLG, 0% barrels on 53 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.227Batting average last 30 days: 0.212
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Kyle Farmer (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 50% of the time): 0 HR, 0.456 xSLG, 2% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (32% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1KBrewers v Lake Bachar (14 bats)0. Jake Bauers (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 17.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 13.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 12 HR, 0.718 xSLG, 14% barrels on 172 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 2 HR, 0.494 xSLG, 6% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.274Batting average last 30 days: 0.262
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 15.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Jackson Chourio (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.62Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 12 HR, 0.635 xSLG, 14% barrels on 191 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 9 HR, 0.522 xSLG, 9% barrels on 149 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.277Batting average last 30 days: 0.296
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Garrett Mitchell (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.14Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 6 HR, 0.789 xSLG, 15% barrels on 105 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.752 xSLG, 21% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.256Batting average last 30 days: 0.278
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 32.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 25Triples vs RHP this season: 10. William Contreras (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.89Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 13 HR, 0.596 xSLG, 9% barrels on 229 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 6 HR, 0.469 xSLG, 5% barrels on 185 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 1HR 0K0. Andrew Vaughn (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.91Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 12 HR, 0.712 xSLG, 15% barrels on 181 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 4 HR, 0.561 xSLG, 10% barrels on 119 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Gary Sánchez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.48Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 4 HR, 0.582 xSLG, 11% barrels on 57 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.424 xSLG, 3% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Brice Turang (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 13 HR, 0.604 xSLG, 7% barrels on 262 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 2 HR, 0.486 xSLG, 3% barrels on 64 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.276Batting average last 30 days: 0.196
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 12.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 25Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Christian Yelich (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.54Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 13 HR, 0.622 xSLG, 10% barrels on 212 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.780 xSLG, 19% barrels on 37 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.245Batting average last 30 days: 0.279
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 19Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Luis Lara (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.52Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.585 xSLG, 7% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Bo Naylor (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 14 HR, 0.647 xSLG, 16% barrels on 162 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.425 xSLG, 4% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.125Batting average last 30 days: 0.145
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 0Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Joey Ortiz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.63Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 8 HR, 0.503 xSLG, 6% barrels on 184 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.419 xSLG, 2% barrels on 124 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Cooper Pratt (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.532 xSLG, 10% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.446 xSLG, 0% barrels on 21 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.316Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 5Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Sal Frelick (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.19Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 5 HR, 0.404 xSLG, 3% barrels on 331 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 2 HR, 0.455 xSLG, 5% barrels on 40 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.258Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 10.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 15Triples vs RHP this season: 00. David Hamilton (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.26Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 33% of the time): 13 HR, 0.483 xSLG, 7% barrels on 182 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 23% of the time): 0 HR, 0.459 xSLG, 5% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.258Batting average last 30 days: 0.263
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 4Cardinals v Blade Tidwell (14 bats)0. Leo Bernal (S)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.68Model composite (chance rating): 18.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.41Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Four-Seam (35% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (30% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 1HR 0K0. Alec Burleson (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 19 HR, 0.643 xSLG, 12% barrels on 319 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 30% of the time): 3 HR, 0.750 xSLG, 11% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K0. Jordan Walker (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.89Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.7%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 6 HR, 0.493 xSLG, 9% barrels on 95 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 7 HR, 0.588 xSLG, 14% barrels on 133 batted balls, 2024–260. Joshua Báez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.07Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.1%vs the Sweeper (39% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (30% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Nolan Gorman (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.87Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 12 HR, 0.760 xSLG, 16% barrels on 141 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (30% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Thomas Saggese (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.67Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.3%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 1 HR, 0.543 xSLG, 3% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.532 xSLG, 8% barrels on 62 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Iván Herrera (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.64Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.5%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 3 HR, 0.494 xSLG, 3% barrels on 86 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 7 HR, 0.495 xSLG, 7% barrels on 162 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 1K0. Ramón Urías (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.7Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 1 HR, 0.424 xSLG, 7% barrels on 46 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 5 HR, 0.527 xSLG, 12% barrels on 97 batted balls, 2024–260. Pedro Pagés (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.67Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 4 HR, 0.417 xSLG, 7% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 4 HR, 0.622 xSLG, 9% barrels on 80 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Bryan Torres (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.53Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 3 HR, 0.587 xSLG, 8% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (30% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K0. Nathan Church (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.45Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 0 HR, 0.453 xSLG, 4% barrels on 74 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (30% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Masyn Winn (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.1%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 39% of the time): 4 HR, 0.418 xSLG, 4% barrels on 95 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 5 HR, 0.435 xSLG, 4% barrels on 256 batted balls, 2024–260. Victor Scott II (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.16Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 3 HR, 0.433 xSLG, 6% barrels on 141 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.469 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K0. José Fermín (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.17Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.5%vs the Sweeper (39% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 1 HR, 0.341 xSLG, 1% barrels on 78 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1KCubs v Martín Pérez (14 bats)0. Pete Crow-Armstrong (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.46Model composite (chance rating): 16.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.71Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 13.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 54% of the time): 1 HR, 0.535 xSLG, 6% barrels on 83 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.267Batting average last 30 days: 0.264
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Michael Conforto (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.61Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.3%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 54% of the time): 1 HR, 0.546 xSLG, 5% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.233Batting average last 30 days: 0.245
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 27.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 16Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Seiya Suzuki (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 5 HR, 0.690 xSLG, 12% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.824 xSLG, 15% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.254Batting average last 30 days: 0.257
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Michael Busch (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.86Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.6%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 54% of the time): 2 HR, 0.488 xSLG, 10% barrels on 69 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.236Batting average last 30 days: 0.215
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 12.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Ian Happ (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.17Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.8%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.356 xSLG, 0% barrels on 66 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.530 xSLG, 8% barrels on 71 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.241Batting average last 30 days: 0.237
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 29.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Carson Kelly (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.65Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.477 xSLG, 6% barrels on 50 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.726 xSLG, 16% barrels on 31 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.247Batting average last 30 days: 0.26
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 9Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Tyrone Taylor (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.5%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.472 xSLG, 2% barrels on 50 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.863 xSLG, 23% barrels on 26 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 1K0. Alex Bregman (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.41Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.6%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 4 HR, 0.509 xSLG, 9% barrels on 67 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.551 xSLG, 4% barrels on 46 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.265Batting average last 30 days: 0.322
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 25Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Miguel Amaya (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.61Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 0 HR, 0.364 xSLG, 2% barrels on 43 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.566 xSLG, 9% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–260. Gabriel Arias (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.4%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.554 xSLG, 5% barrels on 37 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.886 xSLG, 18% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 0K0. Pedro Ramírez (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.47Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.5%vs the Changeup (33% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (27% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.266Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 18.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 9Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Matt Shaw (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.538 xSLG, 11% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.346 xSLG, 0% barrels on 26 batted balls, 2024–260. BJ Murray Jr. (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Changeup (33% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (27% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Nico Hoerner (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.1%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.453 xSLG, 1% barrels on 84 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.399 xSLG, 0% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.272Batting average last 30 days: 0.286
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 8.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 19Triples vs RHP this season: 1Diamondbacks v Janson Junk (14 bats)0. Corbin Carroll (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.37Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 19 HR, 0.627 xSLG, 12% barrels on 315 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 6 HR, 0.595 xSLG, 9% barrels on 137 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.201Batting average last 30 days: 0.228
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 22.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 90. Lars Nootbaar (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.18Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 9 HR, 0.673 xSLG, 11% barrels on 244 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 4 HR, 0.486 xSLG, 8% barrels on 101 batted balls, 2024–260. Tim Tawa (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.49Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.766 xSLG, 17% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.486 xSLG, 9% barrels on 56 batted balls, 2024–260. Gabriel Moreno (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.02Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.555 xSLG, 12% barrels on 51 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 6 HR, 0.583 xSLG, 9% barrels on 154 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.311Batting average last 30 days: 0.303
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 12.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Jordan Lawlar (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.45Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.5%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.624 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.25Batting average last 30 days: 0.225
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 28.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Ketel Marte (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.14Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 20 HR, 0.701 xSLG, 17% barrels on 276 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 6 HR, 0.459 xSLG, 4% barrels on 156 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.23Batting average last 30 days: 0.297
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Nolan Arenado (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.61Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.9%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.329 xSLG, 3% barrels on 116 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 16 HR, 0.443 xSLG, 7% barrels on 272 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.233Batting average last 30 days: 0.187
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 16Triples vs RHP this season: 10. James McCann (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.503 xSLG, 4% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.662 xSLG, 8% barrels on 51 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.299Batting average last 30 days: 0.267
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 28.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 2.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 4Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Tommy Troy (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.26Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.859 xSLG, 13% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.177Batting average last 30 days: 0.203
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 2Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Ryan Waldschmidt (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.8%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.506 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.841 xSLG, 20% barrels on 25 batted balls, 2024–260. Jose Fernandez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.81Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.0%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.568 xSLG, 0% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–260. Geraldo Perdomo (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 12 HR, 0.450 xSLG, 6% barrels on 312 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 4 HR, 0.400 xSLG, 4% barrels on 114 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.248Batting average last 30 days: 0.277
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 12.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 14Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Ildemaro Vargas (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.17Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 2 HR, 0.385 xSLG, 2% barrels on 176 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 0 HR, 0.315 xSLG, 0% barrels on 75 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.226Batting average last 30 days: 0.176
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 10.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Pavin Smith (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 39% of the time): 8 HR, 0.661 xSLG, 15% barrels on 106 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 21% of the time): 5 HR, 0.657 xSLG, 15% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26Dodgers v Rhett Lowder (14 bats)0. Max Muncy (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.32Model composite (chance rating): 19.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.47Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 20 HR, 0.826 xSLG, 17% barrels on 166 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 10 HR, 0.588 xSLG, 11% barrels on 104 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Teoscar Hernández (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.7Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 4 HR, 0.557 xSLG, 6% barrels on 201 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 10 HR, 0.572 xSLG, 10% barrels on 140 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 1K0. Will Smith (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 5 HR, 0.621 xSLG, 12% barrels on 152 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 4 HR, 0.472 xSLG, 6% barrels on 118 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Josue De Paula (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (27% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Kyle Tucker (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.44Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 21 HR, 0.646 xSLG, 15% barrels on 265 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 5 HR, 0.433 xSLG, 4% barrels on 107 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K0. Mookie Betts (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.56Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 9 HR, 0.580 xSLG, 6% barrels on 190 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 7 HR, 0.432 xSLG, 6% barrels on 143 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 1HR 1K0. Freddie Freeman (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.66Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 23 HR, 0.647 xSLG, 11% barrels on 345 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.478 xSLG, 8% barrels on 107 batted balls, 2024–260. Hunter Feduccia (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.95Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.695 xSLG, 19% barrels on 58 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.412 xSLG, 0% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Enrique Hernández (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.468 xSLG, 1% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 3 HR, 0.397 xSLG, 3% barrels on 59 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Tommy Edman (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.7Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.418 xSLG, 3% barrels on 151 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.347 xSLG, 0% barrels on 59 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Alex Freeland (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.584 xSLG, 9% barrels on 64 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.332 xSLG, 0% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Miguel Rojas (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.52Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.5%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.389 xSLG, 2% barrels on 86 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.372 xSLG, 3% barrels on 72 batted balls, 2024–260. Eliezer Alfonzo (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (27% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Alex Call (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.17Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.5%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.321 xSLG, 1% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 0 HR, 0.406 xSLG, 2% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26Giants v Andre Pallante (13 bats)0. Bryce Eldridge (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.62Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 7 HR, 0.921 xSLG, 19% barrels on 63 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (20% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.241Batting average last 30 days: 0.283
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Grant McCray (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.7Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 1 HR, 0.538 xSLG, 10% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (20% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 4K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.103Batting average last 30 days: 0.111
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Shay Whitcomb (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.5%vs the Slider (40% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.454 xSLG, 5% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 1K0. Drew Gilbert (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.8Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 6 HR, 0.575 xSLG, 8% barrels on 102 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 20% of the time): 0 HR, 0.300 xSLG, 0% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/5 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.266Batting average last 30 days: 0.213
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Osleivis Basabe (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.7%vs the Slider (40% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.434 xSLG, 11% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.279Batting average last 30 days: 0.198
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 2.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 2Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Jung Hoo Lee (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.5Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 6 HR, 0.468 xSLG, 4% barrels on 289 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 20% of the time): 1 HR, 0.459 xSLG, 4% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/6 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.297Batting average last 30 days: 0.184
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 8.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 30. Brett Harris (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slider (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.295 xSLG, 0% barrels on 15 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.395 xSLG, 5% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–260. Turner Hill (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.59vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 0 HR, 0.676 xSLG, 11% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (20% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Drew Cavanaugh (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 53% of the time): 1 HR, 0.550 xSLG, 6% barrels on 31 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (20% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.255Batting average last 30 days: 0.254
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Andrew Knizner (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slider (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.339 xSLG, 0% barrels on 25 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 35% of the time): 0 HR, 0.366 xSLG, 6% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–260. Jonah Cox (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.67Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Slider (40% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (35% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.276Batting average last 30 days: 0.302
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 33.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Christian Koss (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Slider (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.448 xSLG, 6% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.427 xSLG, 4% barrels on 57 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.218Batting average last 30 days: 0.222
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 4Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Nate Furman (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (53% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (20% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedGuardians v Davis Martin (14 bats)0. Nathaniel Lowe (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 14 HR, 0.602 xSLG, 9% barrels on 314 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 5 HR, 0.530 xSLG, 6% barrels on 109 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/0 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.276Batting average last 30 days: 0.231
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Chase DeLauter (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.86Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 6 HR, 0.606 xSLG, 13% barrels on 93 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 0 HR, 0.394 xSLG, 2% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Jo Adell (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.1Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.2%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 26% of the time): 10 HR, 0.519 xSLG, 8% barrels on 222 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 24% of the time): 11 HR, 0.709 xSLG, 12% barrels on 135 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/7 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.215Batting average last 30 days: 0.232
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 20Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Angel Martínez (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 3 HR, 0.454 xSLG, 5% barrels on 164 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 4 HR, 0.344 xSLG, 3% barrels on 89 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.228Batting average last 30 days: 0.307
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 10. José Ramírez (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.48Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 22 HR, 0.579 xSLG, 9% barrels on 278 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 6 HR, 0.400 xSLG, 2% barrels on 196 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/9 0HR 1K0. David Fry (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.64Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.1%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.401 xSLG, 4% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 24% of the time): 2 HR, 0.437 xSLG, 8% barrels on 40 batted balls, 2024–260. Patrick Bailey (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.08Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 11 HR, 0.622 xSLG, 8% barrels on 199 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 2 HR, 0.372 xSLG, 3% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.215Batting average last 30 days: 0.241
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 6Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Travis Bazzana (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 6 HR, 0.605 xSLG, 8% barrels on 87 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 2 HR, 0.378 xSLG, 4% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.271Batting average last 30 days: 0.228
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 16Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Austin Hedges (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.27Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.444 xSLG, 6% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 24% of the time): 1 HR, 0.281 xSLG, 0% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 1HR 0K0. Daniel Schneemann (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.79Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 11 HR, 0.735 xSLG, 15% barrels on 149 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 0 HR, 0.405 xSLG, 4% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/7 0HR 3K0. Angel Genao (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.18Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.635 xSLG, 12% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (18% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.258Batting average last 30 days: 0.253
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 2Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Steven Kwan (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.23Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 11 HR, 0.379 xSLG, 1% barrels on 429 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 2 HR, 0.388 xSLG, 3% barrels on 151 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 4/9 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.286Batting average last 30 days: 0.312
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 8.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 12Triples vs RHP this season: 30. Brayan Rocchio (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.17Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 7 HR, 0.451 xSLG, 4% barrels on 241 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 1 HR, 0.340 xSLG, 0% barrels on 122 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.26Batting average last 30 days: 0.195
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Petey Halpin (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 2 HR, 0.576 xSLG, 6% barrels on 32 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 18% of the time): 0 HR, 0.453 xSLG, 5% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.252Batting average last 30 days: 0.231
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 18.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 4Triples vs RHP this season: 1Jays v Drew Anderson (14 bats)0. Kazuma Okamoto (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.83Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 8 HR, 0.810 xSLG, 20% barrels on 69 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (28% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.219Batting average last 30 days: 0.217
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 30.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.84Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 12 HR, 0.676 xSLG, 13% barrels on 238 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 28% of the time): 2 HR, 0.531 xSLG, 7% barrels on 82 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.261Batting average last 30 days: 0.276
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 12.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Alejandro Kirk (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.61Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 6 HR, 0.652 xSLG, 14% barrels on 132 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 28% of the time): 2 HR, 0.606 xSLG, 12% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–260. George Springer (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.47Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 21 HR, 0.788 xSLG, 17% barrels on 221 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 28% of the time): 3 HR, 0.558 xSLG, 14% barrels on 37 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Sean Keys (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (42% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Changeup (33% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.214Batting average last 30 days: 0.5
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 34.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Davis Schneider (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 7 HR, 0.633 xSLG, 15% barrels on 87 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (28% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Brandon Valenzuela (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.6Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 2 HR, 0.634 xSLG, 9% barrels on 43 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.467 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.235Batting average last 30 days: 0.121
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 27.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Josh Smith (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 9 HR, 0.482 xSLG, 5% barrels on 259 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.374 xSLG, 3% barrels on 149 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.231Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Brett Bateman (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.39Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 1 HR, 0.598 xSLG, 6% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (33% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.323Batting average last 30 days: 0.33
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Nathan Lukes (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 5 HR, 0.419 xSLG, 2% barrels on 231 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 4 HR, 0.488 xSLG, 10% barrels on 86 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.3Batting average last 30 days: 0.26
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Andrés Giménez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.4Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 11 HR, 0.499 xSLG, 4% barrels on 273 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.422 xSLG, 4% barrels on 134 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.252Batting average last 30 days: 0.293
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Myles Straw (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 3 HR, 0.485 xSLG, 3% barrels on 69 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (28% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Ernie Clement (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 6 HR, 0.397 xSLG, 2% barrels on 221 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 28% of the time): 1 HR, 0.357 xSLG, 0% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Charles McAdoo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Four-Seam (38% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Changeup (28% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedMariners v Ryan Johnson (14 bats)0. Cal Raleigh (S)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.53Model composite (chance rating): 14.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.67Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.6%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 38% of the time): 12 HR, 0.648 xSLG, 16% barrels on 76 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 30% of the time): 2 HR, 0.574 xSLG, 18% barrels on 49 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Dominic Canzone (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.74Model composite (chance rating): 15.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.2%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 38% of the time): 3 HR, 0.747 xSLG, 20% barrels on 40 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 30% of the time): 2 HR, 0.624 xSLG, 11% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Lazaro Montes (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Cutter (38% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Splitter (30% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Randy Arozarena (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 37% of the time): 6 HR, 0.517 xSLG, 9% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 31% of the time): 9 HR, 0.557 xSLG, 9% barrels on 113 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Cole Young (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.72Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 38% of the time): 1 HR, 0.408 xSLG, 5% barrels on 37 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 30% of the time): 1 HR, 0.371 xSLG, 3% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 1HR 0K0. Julio Rodríguez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.59Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 37% of the time): 3 HR, 0.586 xSLG, 7% barrels on 73 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 31% of the time): 4 HR, 0.593 xSLG, 8% barrels on 109 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K0. Michael Arroyo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Cutter (37% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (31% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jhonny Pereda (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.37Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Cutter (37% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (31% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. J.P. Crawford (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.54Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.7%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 38% of the time): 2 HR, 0.410 xSLG, 1% barrels on 80 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.419 xSLG, 0% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 1K0. Josh Naylor (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.58Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.6%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 38% of the time): 5 HR, 0.633 xSLG, 8% barrels on 93 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (he'll see it 30% of the time): 2 HR, 0.458 xSLG, 4% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Brock Rodden (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Cutter (38% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Splitter (30% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Taylor Ward (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.59Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.2%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 37% of the time): 1 HR, 0.444 xSLG, 4% barrels on 83 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 31% of the time): 5 HR, 0.387 xSLG, 2% barrels on 83 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K0. Victor Robles (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.14Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.3%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 37% of the time): 0 HR, 0.386 xSLG, 4% barrels on 27 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 31% of the time): 0 HR, 0.339 xSLG, 0% barrels on 34 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Weston Wilson (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.61Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.3%vs the Cutter (37% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (31% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedMarlins v Michael Soroka (14 bats)0. Griffin Conine (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 16.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.83Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 14.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 7 HR, 1.014 xSLG, 24% barrels on 45 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.269Batting average last 30 days: 0.238
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 30.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 6Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Kyle Stowers (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 13 HR, 0.699 xSLG, 16% barrels on 182 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.266Batting average last 30 days: 0.327
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 32.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Heriberto Hernández (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.69Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.6%vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 6 HR, 0.646 xSLG, 15% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.223Batting average last 30 days: 0.21
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 30.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Joe Mack (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.03Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 5 HR, 0.581 xSLG, 6% barrels on 51 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.244Batting average last 30 days: 0.203
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 25.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Otto Lopez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.8Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.9%vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 10 HR, 0.616 xSLG, 8% barrels on 199 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.29Batting average last 30 days: 0.212
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 50. Jared Serna (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (26% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Graham Pauley (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.29Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 3 HR, 0.516 xSLG, 9% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.195Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 9Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Javier Sanoja (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.29Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.5%vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.396 xSLG, 2% barrels on 121 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.271Batting average last 30 days: 0.351
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 19Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Agustín Ramírez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.36Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.8%vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 5 HR, 0.756 xSLG, 16% barrels on 64 batted balls, 2024–260. Deyvison De Los Santos (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (26% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jakob Marsee (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 4 HR, 0.418 xSLG, 5% barrels on 155 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.218Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 12.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 15Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Esteury Ruiz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.42Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.2%vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.421 xSLG, 10% barrels on 21 batted balls, 2024–260. Brian Navarreto (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slurve (35% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (26% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Xavier Edwards (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.37Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 36% of the time): 5 HR, 0.471 xSLG, 4% barrels on 264 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slurve (30% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0KMets v Shane Baz (14 bats)0. Juan Soto (L)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.0Model composite (chance rating): 16.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.07Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 27 HR, 1.007 xSLG, 24% barrels on 225 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (35% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/5 1HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.261Batting average last 30 days: 0.19
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 14.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 11.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 20. Francisco Lindor (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 27 HR, 0.701 xSLG, 13% barrels on 305 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.908 xSLG, 28% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.208Batting average last 30 days: 0.234
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 14.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 11.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Brett Baty (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.28Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 11 HR, 0.637 xSLG, 10% barrels on 201 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.807 xSLG, 12% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. A.J. Ewing (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.65Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 3 HR, 0.616 xSLG, 9% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (35% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.26Batting average last 30 days: 0.173
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 27.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 5Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Francisco Alvarez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.54Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.3%vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.648 xSLG, 12% barrels on 25 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 0K0. Mark Vientos (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.67Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.1%vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 5 HR, 0.835 xSLG, 25% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.275Batting average last 30 days: 0.4
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 20.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 4.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 5Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Jared Young (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 3 HR, 0.604 xSLG, 11% barrels on 70 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (35% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Carson Benge (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 42% of the time): 3 HR, 0.540 xSLG, 4% barrels on 98 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (35% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.273Batting average last 30 days: 0.333
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 26.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Bo Bichette (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.8Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Knuckle-Curve (he'll see it 29% of the time): 1 HR, 0.519 xSLG, 10% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.424 xSLG, 3% barrels on 78 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 1HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.273Batting average last 30 days: 0.313
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 16.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 11Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Marcus Semien (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.82Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.446 xSLG, 7% barrels on 91 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/5 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.23Batting average last 30 days: 0.239
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 21.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 12.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Cristian Pache (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Luis Torrens (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.53Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.1%vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.400 xSLG, 0% barrels on 34 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.254Batting average last 30 days: 0.317
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 20.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Christopher Morel (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.731 xSLG, 17% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–260. Nick Morabito (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Knuckle-Curve (29% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.118(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.333
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 47.6%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 4.8%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 1Triples vs LHP this season: 0Nationals v Cristopher Sánchez (15 bats)0. James Wood (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.85Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 58% of the time): 5 HR, 0.589 xSLG, 10% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 29% of the time): 6 HR, 0.756 xSLG, 16% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/11 0HR 3K0. CJ Abrams (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.13Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 58% of the time): 3 HR, 0.427 xSLG, 3% barrels on 115 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 29% of the time): 5 HR, 0.572 xSLG, 7% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 4/14 0HR 3K0. Brady House (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.45Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.5%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 0 HR, 0.532 xSLG, 5% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.622 xSLG, 6% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/4 0HR 1K0. Andrés Chaparro (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.72Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.1%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 1 HR, 0.440 xSLG, 3% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.545 xSLG, 13% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/8 0HR 2K0. Dylan Crews (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.1%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 0 HR, 0.541 xSLG, 3% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 1 HR, 0.486 xSLG, 6% barrels on 35 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 4/8 0HR 4K0. Andrew Pinckney (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Changeup (44% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (40% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 1HR 0K0. Yohandy Morales (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Changeup (44% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (40% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Daylen Lile (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.03Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 58% of the time): 0 HR, 0.339 xSLG, 0% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 29% of the time): 1 HR, 0.396 xSLG, 0% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/6 0HR 2K0. Keibert Ruiz (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 3 HR, 0.517 xSLG, 10% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.363 xSLG, 2% barrels on 59 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/5 0HR 2K0. José Tena (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 58% of the time): 0 HR, 0.390 xSLG, 11% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (29% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Abimelec Ortiz (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.56Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.9%vs the Sinker (58% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (29% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Harry Ford (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.5Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.4%vs the Changeup (44% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (40% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K0. Jacob Young (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.5Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 0 HR, 0.370 xSLG, 0% barrels on 72 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.415 xSLG, 5% barrels on 62 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 5/13 0HR 0K0. Nasim Nuñez (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.23Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.7%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 44% of the time): 0 HR, 0.341 xSLG, 0% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.292 xSLG, 0% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 3K0. Jorbit Vivas (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 58% of the time): 0 HR, 0.169 xSLG, 0% barrels on 15 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (29% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0KOrioles v Sean Manaea (14 bats)0. Pete Alonso (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.08Model composite (chance rating): 18.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 3.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 13 HR, 0.784 xSLG, 16% barrels on 116 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 28% of the time): 1 HR, 0.675 xSLG, 13% barrels on 15 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.247Batting average last 30 days: 0.33
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 24.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Coby Mayo (R)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.33Model composite (chance rating): 18.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.35Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 6 HR, 0.751 xSLG, 15% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.318Batting average last 30 days: 0.286
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 26.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 6.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 8Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Christian Encarnacion-Strand (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 0.93Model composite (chance rating): 15.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 3 HR, 0.861 xSLG, 24% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.327Batting average last 30 days: 0.272
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 28.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Gunnar Henderson (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 36% of the time): 4 HR, 0.740 xSLG, 16% barrels on 37 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 32% of the time): 1 HR, 0.378 xSLG, 2% barrels on 133 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.232Batting average last 30 days: 0.235
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 20.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 9Triples vs LHP this season: 30. Samuel Basallo (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.66Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.3%vs the Sweeper (36% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 32% of the time): 0 HR, 0.305 xSLG, 0% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–260. Colton Cowser (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.7%vs the Sweeper (36% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 32% of the time): 2 HR, 0.675 xSLG, 9% barrels on 43 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.16Batting average last 30 days: 0.247
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 45.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 11.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 0Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Jeremiah Jackson (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.77Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 1 HR, 0.604 xSLG, 18% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Rece Hinds (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (43% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.205(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.0
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 43.8%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 4.2%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 5Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Dylan Beavers (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.8Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Sweeper (36% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (he'll see it 32% of the time): 1 HR, 0.542 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–260. Carlos Narváez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 3 HR, 0.537 xSLG, 13% barrels on 39 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.164Batting average last 30 days: 0.091
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 28.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Leody Taveras (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.44Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 43% of the time): 0 HR, 0.411 xSLG, 5% barrels on 64 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.187Batting average last 30 days: 0.213
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 32.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Heston Kjerstad (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sweeper (36% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (32% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jackson Holliday (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.65Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 36% of the time): 0 HR, 0.227 xSLG, 0% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 32% of the time): 2 HR, 0.445 xSLG, 3% barrels on 61 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Yohel Pozo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.0%vs the Four-Seam (43% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (28% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedPadres v Kyle Freeland (14 bats)0. Jackson Merrill (L)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.36Model composite (chance rating): 15.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.81Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 2 HR, 0.683 xSLG, 11% barrels on 89 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 20% of the time): 3 HR, 0.549 xSLG, 9% barrels on 92 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K0. Fernando Tatis Jr. (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 17.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 7 HR, 0.613 xSLG, 11% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/6 0HR 2K0. Ty France (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 15.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.19Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 2 HR, 0.572 xSLG, 9% barrels on 89 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/4 0HR 0K0. Manny Machado (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.08Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 11 HR, 0.716 xSLG, 17% barrels on 106 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/7 0HR 1K0. Luis Campusano (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 1 HR, 0.397 xSLG, 2% barrels on 40 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Xander Bogaerts (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.49Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 2 HR, 0.518 xSLG, 7% barrels on 129 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/5 0HR 1K0. Jase Bowen (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.43Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 1 HR, 0.573 xSLG, 12% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Freddy Fermin (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 1 HR, 0.439 xSLG, 4% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K0. Austin Hays (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.58Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 2 HR, 0.754 xSLG, 18% barrels on 51 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/2 0HR 0K0. Ethan Salas (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (23% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (20% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Dustin Harris (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.4vs the Four-Seam (23% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (20% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Samad Taylor (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 24% of the time): 0 HR, 0.407 xSLG, 6% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Knuckle-Curve (23% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Sung-Mun Song (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.1Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.6%vs the Four-Seam (23% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sinker (20% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jake Cronenworth (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.3Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.463 xSLG, 1% barrels on 82 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 20% of the time): 2 HR, 0.377 xSLG, 2% barrels on 90 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 1KPhillies v Jackson Kent (14 bats)0. Kyle Schwarber (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 3.36Model composite (chance rating): 17.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.64Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 17.1%vs the Slider (he'll see it 41% of the time): 7 HR, 0.684 xSLG, 10% barrels on 70 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 21 HR, 0.988 xSLG, 25% barrels on 115 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.223Batting average last 30 days: 0.217
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 35.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 11Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Bryce Harper (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.99Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.8%vs the Slider (he'll see it 41% of the time): 4 HR, 0.593 xSLG, 13% barrels on 93 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 7 HR, 0.913 xSLG, 21% barrels on 71 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.304Batting average last 30 days: 0.355
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 16.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Brandon Marsh (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.03Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Slider (he'll see it 41% of the time): 1 HR, 0.529 xSLG, 12% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.469 xSLG, 7% barrels on 43 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.279Batting average last 30 days: 0.212
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 21.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Edmundo Sosa (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 3 HR, 0.519 xSLG, 7% barrels on 90 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.522 xSLG, 5% barrels on 60 batted balls, 2024–260. Derek Hill (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 4 HR, 0.750 xSLG, 19% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.545 xSLG, 7% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–260. Alec Bohm (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.83Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 10 HR, 0.573 xSLG, 10% barrels on 136 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.497 xSLG, 7% barrels on 70 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.228Batting average last 30 days: 0.344
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 14.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Bryson Stott (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.77Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.6%vs the Slider (he'll see it 41% of the time): 2 HR, 0.404 xSLG, 4% barrels on 51 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.545 xSLG, 6% barrels on 63 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.25Batting average last 30 days: 0.268
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 50. J.T. Realmuto (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.98Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 3 HR, 0.513 xSLG, 10% barrels on 88 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.537 xSLG, 12% barrels on 56 batted balls, 2024–260. Justin Crawford (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.32Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.4%vs the Slider (41% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (35% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.273Batting average last 30 days: 0.273
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Trea Turner (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.44Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 5 HR, 0.528 xSLG, 6% barrels on 126 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.426 xSLG, 4% barrels on 85 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.243Batting average last 30 days: 0.183
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 16Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Bryan De La Cruz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.08Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 3 HR, 0.708 xSLG, 9% barrels on 45 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.684 xSLG, 11% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–260. Luis Arraez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.7%vs the Slider (he'll see it 41% of the time): 2 HR, 0.335 xSLG, 0% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.356 xSLG, 1% barrels on 164 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.318Batting average last 30 days: 0.28
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 2.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Garrett Stubbs (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slider (41% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (35% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.132Batting average last 30 days: 0.15
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 0Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Rafael Marchán (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 1 HR, 0.441 xSLG, 5% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedPirates v Jacob Misiorowski (14 bats)0. Oneil Cruz (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 16.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 3.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 13 HR, 0.824 xSLG, 17% barrels on 187 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 5 HR, 0.808 xSLG, 19% barrels on 57 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/8 0HR 6K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.251Batting average last 30 days: 0.283
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 31.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Bryan Reynolds (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.66Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 16 HR, 0.737 xSLG, 13% barrels on 299 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 3 HR, 0.642 xSLG, 5% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/6 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.25Batting average last 30 days: 0.245
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 21Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Rafael Flores Jr. (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.34Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Four-Seam (62% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (18% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Brandon Lowe (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.63Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 25 HR, 0.941 xSLG, 24% barrels on 177 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 6 HR, 0.665 xSLG, 8% barrels on 72 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.276Batting average last 30 days: 0.245
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 22Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Ryan O'Hearn (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.97Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 20 HR, 0.598 xSLG, 8% barrels on 292 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 6 HR, 0.522 xSLG, 8% barrels on 76 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 1K0. Henry Davis (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 62% of the time): 3 HR, 0.558 xSLG, 13% barrels on 84 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 18% of the time): 3 HR, 0.600 xSLG, 16% barrels on 58 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.194Batting average last 30 days: 0.135
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 4Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Jacob Gonzalez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 1 HR, 0.538 xSLG, 2% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (14% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.215Batting average last 30 days: 0.196
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 5Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Konnor Griffin (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.26Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 62% of the time): 2 HR, 0.659 xSLG, 12% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 18% of the time): 1 HR, 0.610 xSLG, 10% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.257Batting average last 30 days: 0.0
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Spencer Horwitz (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.36Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 9 HR, 0.485 xSLG, 7% barrels on 260 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 6 HR, 0.533 xSLG, 9% barrels on 70 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.251Batting average last 30 days: 0.167
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 12Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Nick Gonzales (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.84Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 62% of the time): 4 HR, 0.576 xSLG, 8% barrels on 149 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 18% of the time): 3 HR, 0.474 xSLG, 5% barrels on 129 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/8 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.325Batting average last 30 days: 0.317
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 16.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Jake Mangum (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.46Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 1 HR, 0.477 xSLG, 3% barrels on 96 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (he'll see it 14% of the time): 2 HR, 0.579 xSLG, 8% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 2K0. Ronny Simon (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 64% of the time): 0 HR, 0.634 xSLG, 14% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (14% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jared Triolo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.13Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 62% of the time): 4 HR, 0.513 xSLG, 6% barrels on 154 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 18% of the time): 4 HR, 0.471 xSLG, 7% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 1K0. Billy Cook (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (62% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (18% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedRangers v Patrick Sandoval (14 bats)0. Joc Pederson (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.4Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.9%vs the Sinker (40% of the time): sample too thin (11 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (30% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Corey Seager (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.97Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 4 HR, 0.621 xSLG, 11% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 30% of the time): 7 HR, 0.893 xSLG, 25% barrels on 61 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.245Batting average last 30 days: 0.281
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 26.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 11.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Jake Burger (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.58Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.5%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 5 HR, 0.577 xSLG, 10% barrels on 77 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 10 HR, 0.770 xSLG, 19% barrels on 90 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.258Batting average last 30 days: 0.235
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 26.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Justin Foscue (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.79Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.6%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 1 HR, 0.616 xSLG, 12% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.575 xSLG, 11% barrels on 44 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.308Batting average last 30 days: 0.288
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 24.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 9Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Wyatt Langford (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.8%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 2 HR, 0.457 xSLG, 10% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 6 HR, 0.631 xSLG, 10% barrels on 86 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.243Batting average last 30 days: 0.211
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 23.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 10.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Brandon Nimmo (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.1%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 3 HR, 0.520 xSLG, 6% barrels on 114 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 30% of the time): 4 HR, 0.485 xSLG, 8% barrels on 83 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.327Batting average last 30 days: 0.248
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 19.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 5.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 12Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Josh Jung (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.09Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 1 HR, 0.438 xSLG, 4% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 4 HR, 0.665 xSLG, 13% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–260. Elias Díaz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.52Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 2 HR, 0.405 xSLG, 4% barrels on 54 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.416 xSLG, 5% barrels on 63 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.253Batting average last 30 days: 0.219
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 21.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 3.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Ezequiel Duran (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.81Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.8%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 0 HR, 0.322 xSLG, 2% barrels on 56 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.475 xSLG, 2% barrels on 63 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.295Batting average last 30 days: 0.267
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 22.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 13.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Danny Jansen (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.48Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.0%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 36% of the time): 0 HR, 0.402 xSLG, 3% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.436 xSLG, 8% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–260. Evan Carter (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.223 xSLG, 0% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (30% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Cody Freeman (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.12Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.7%vs the Changeup (36% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.337 xSLG, 10% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.324Batting average last 30 days: 0.286
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 14.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 0Triples vs LHP this season: 10. Cam Cauley (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.06Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Changeup (36% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (26% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Nicky Lopez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): -0.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 40% of the time): 0 HR, 0.284 xSLG, 0% barrels on 26 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.353 xSLG, 0% barrels on 25 batted balls, 2024–26Rays v Jack Perkins (14 bats)0. Junior Caminero (R)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 3.79Model composite (chance rating): 18.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.36Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 21 HR, 0.858 xSLG, 21% barrels on 136 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 33% of the time): 7 HR, 0.563 xSLG, 10% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.296Batting average last 30 days: 0.264
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 13.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 13.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Victor Mesa Jr. (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.93Model composite (chance rating): 14.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.79Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 5 HR, 0.609 xSLG, 14% barrels on 49 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.742 xSLG, 16% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.278Batting average last 30 days: 0.279
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 17.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 5.1%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 1Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Jonathan Aranda (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.5Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 12 HR, 0.700 xSLG, 12% barrels on 192 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 5 HR, 0.578 xSLG, 7% barrels on 101 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.23Batting average last 30 days: 0.243
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 28.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 10.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Yandy Díaz (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 10 HR, 0.596 xSLG, 10% barrels on 209 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 33% of the time): 9 HR, 0.619 xSLG, 10% barrels on 100 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.305Batting average last 30 days: 0.33
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 12.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Ryan Vilade (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.42Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 2 HR, 0.818 xSLG, 19% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (33% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.273Batting average last 30 days: 0.297
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 21.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 6.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 6Triples vs LHP this season: 20. Richie Palacios (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 4 HR, 0.432 xSLG, 5% barrels on 139 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 3 HR, 0.550 xSLG, 3% barrels on 58 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K0. Liam Hicks (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.23Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 11 HR, 0.478 xSLG, 6% barrels on 212 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 2 HR, 0.360 xSLG, 1% barrels on 87 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 4/5 1HR 1K0. Jonny DeLuca (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.66Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 3 HR, 0.445 xSLG, 7% barrels on 88 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.489 xSLG, 5% barrels on 44 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.252Batting average last 30 days: 0.25
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 20.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 3.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 9Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Cedric Mullins (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.23Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 16 HR, 0.471 xSLG, 7% barrels on 298 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 5 HR, 0.498 xSLG, 6% barrels on 108 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 0K0. Kenny Piper (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (34% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Sweeper (33% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Jorge Mateo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.91Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 0 HR, 0.423 xSLG, 2% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 33% of the time): 1 HR, 0.371 xSLG, 4% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.203Batting average last 30 days: 0.147
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 27.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 6.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Nick Fortes (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.01Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 3 HR, 0.366 xSLG, 2% barrels on 109 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 33% of the time): 3 HR, 0.446 xSLG, 7% barrels on 42 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.252Batting average last 30 days: 0.148
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 11.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 4.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 8Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Nick Madrigal (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.01vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 34% of the time): 0 HR, 0.408 xSLG, 0% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sweeper (33% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Chandler Simpson (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 0.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 0 HR, 0.361 xSLG, 0% barrels on 265 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.336 xSLG, 0% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.284Batting average last 30 days: 0.339
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 10.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 1.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 4Triples vs LHP this season: 3Reds v Yoshinobu Yamamoto (14 bats)0. Elly De La Cruz (S)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.91Model composite (chance rating): 19.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.74Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Splitter (he'll see it 31% of the time): 0 HR, 0.369 xSLG, 3% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 25 HR, 0.830 xSLG, 21% barrels on 282 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/7 1HR 3K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.34Batting average last 30 days: 0.274
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 25.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 10.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 11Triples vs LHP this season: 30. Eugenio Suárez (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.61Model composite (chance rating): 14.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.28Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 28 HR, 0.762 xSLG, 18% barrels on 234 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/7 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.189Batting average last 30 days: 0.226
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 40.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 16.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Sal Stewart (R)QUIET
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.15Model composite (chance rating): 16.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.93Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 9 HR, 0.888 xSLG, 22% barrels on 63 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.286Batting average last 30 days: 0.305
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 22.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 9.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Tyler Stephenson (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.42Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 13 HR, 0.760 xSLG, 17% barrels on 157 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 3K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.2Batting average last 30 days: 0.229
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 24.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 17.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 4Triples vs LHP this season: 00. JJ Bleday (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.92Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.2%vs the Splitter (he'll see it 31% of the time): 0 HR, 0.297 xSLG, 0% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 17 HR, 0.599 xSLG, 10% barrels on 249 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.215Batting average last 30 days: 0.2
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 22.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 11.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Juan Brito (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.31Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.5%vs the Splitter (31% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (30% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.159(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.143
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 32.9%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 7.1%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 4Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Matt McLain (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 8 HR, 0.672 xSLG, 14% barrels on 104 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.253Batting average last 30 days: 0.184
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 21.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 12.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 2Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Ke'Bryan Hayes (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.65Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.419 xSLG, 6% barrels on 162 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 2K0. Jose Trevino (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.15Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.2%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 4 HR, 0.427 xSLG, 4% barrels on 104 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Carlos Jorge (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Splitter (31% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (30% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K0. Héctor Rodríguez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.23Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.4%vs the Splitter (31% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (30% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.225(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.237
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 27.3%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 8.0%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 3Triples vs LHP this season: 00. Will Banfield (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Four-Seam (22% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. TJ Friedl (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.3%vs the Splitter (he'll see it 31% of the time): 0 HR, 0.404 xSLG, 0% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 30% of the time): 11 HR, 0.389 xSLG, 3% barrels on 299 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 1K0. Dane Myers (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.505 xSLG, 7% barrels on 71 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Splitter (22% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs LHP: 0.302Batting average last 30 days: 0.259
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs LHP: 21.1%
Walk
Walk rate vs LHP: 10.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs LHP this season: 7Triples vs LHP this season: 0Rockies v Walker Buehler (14 bats)0. Hunter Goodman (R)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.17Model composite (chance rating): 16.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.77Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.9%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 25% of the time): 8 HR, 0.507 xSLG, 7% barrels on 126 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 16 HR, 0.845 xSLG, 22% barrels on 140 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Mickey Moniak (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.07Model composite (chance rating): 14.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.44Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.7%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 29% of the time): 6 HR, 0.584 xSLG, 11% barrels on 82 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 24 HR, 0.683 xSLG, 13% barrels on 245 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/6 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.262Batting average last 30 days: 0.163
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 24.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 15Triples vs RHP this season: 30. Connor Norby (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 14.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.9Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.9%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 25% of the time): 3 HR, 0.558 xSLG, 4% barrels on 96 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 5 HR, 0.646 xSLG, 12% barrels on 94 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K0. Kyle Karros (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.96Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.1%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 25% of the time): 1 HR, 0.430 xSLG, 3% barrels on 75 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 5 HR, 0.606 xSLG, 10% barrels on 68 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 0K0. Adael Amador (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.29Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.4%vs the Cutter (29% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 2 HR, 0.467 xSLG, 9% barrels on 53 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.364(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.381
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 18.5%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.1%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 2Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Cole Carrigg (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.98Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.0%vs the Cutter (29% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 3 HR, 0.401 xSLG, 3% barrels on 38 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.252Batting average last 30 days: 0.202
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Jake McCarthy (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.91Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.2%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 29% of the time): 3 HR, 0.550 xSLG, 6% barrels on 70 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 12 HR, 0.522 xSLG, 6% barrels on 242 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.287Batting average last 30 days: 0.277
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 16.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 24Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Brett Sullivan (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.57Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Cutter (29% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 4 HR, 0.589 xSLG, 8% barrels on 49 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.233Batting average last 30 days: 0.26
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 18.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 8Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Vimael Machín (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Cutter (29% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (21% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Zac Veen (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Cutter (29% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (21% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Ezequiel Tovar (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.04Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.3%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 25% of the time): 5 HR, 0.504 xSLG, 7% barrels on 154 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 3 HR, 0.535 xSLG, 7% barrels on 198 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 5/10 1HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.223Batting average last 30 days: 0.241
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 22.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.8%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 13Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Troy Johnston (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.63Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.3%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 29% of the time): 1 HR, 0.546 xSLG, 3% barrels on 30 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 0 HR, 0.546 xSLG, 3% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/4 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.314Batting average last 30 days: 0.333
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 18.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 28Triples vs RHP this season: 10. TJ Rumfield (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.52Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.5%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 29% of the time): 1 HR, 0.426 xSLG, 6% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 21% of the time): 3 HR, 0.498 xSLG, 8% barrels on 89 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/4 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.294Batting average last 30 days: 0.299
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 19Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Jordan Beck (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.37Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.8%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 25% of the time): 1 HR, 0.443 xSLG, 4% barrels on 105 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 6 HR, 0.713 xSLG, 12% barrels on 88 batted balls, 2024–26Royals v Hunter Brown (14 bats)0. Jac Caglianone (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.98Model composite (chance rating): 15.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.52Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 5 HR, 0.716 xSLG, 16% barrels on 93 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 1 HR, 0.690 xSLG, 11% barrels on 27 batted balls, 2024–260. Bobby Witt Jr. (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 15.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.05Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 41% of the time): 8 HR, 0.680 xSLG, 12% barrels on 229 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 19 HR, 0.820 xSLG, 21% barrels on 249 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/8 1HR 3K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.285Batting average last 30 days: 0.283
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.0%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 20Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Carter Jensen (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.97Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.1%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 9 HR, 0.675 xSLG, 15% barrels on 73 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.808 xSLG, 16% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–260. Salvador Perez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.11Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.5%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 41% of the time): 16 HR, 0.671 xSLG, 12% barrels on 205 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 18 HR, 0.834 xSLG, 19% barrels on 243 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 3/8 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.207Batting average last 30 days: 0.258
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 3.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Vinnie Pasquantino (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.78Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.0%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 15 HR, 0.531 xSLG, 9% barrels on 378 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 7 HR, 0.692 xSLG, 16% barrels on 103 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/8 0HR 2K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.262Batting average last 30 days: 0.283
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 13.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 11.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 12Triples vs RHP this season: 10. John Rave (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.51Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 4 HR, 0.759 xSLG, 19% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (22% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.209Batting average last 30 days: 0.167
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 20.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 4Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Michael Massey (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.88Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 8 HR, 0.479 xSLG, 7% barrels on 243 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.517 xSLG, 6% barrels on 77 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 2/6 0HR 0K0. Kyle Isbel (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.38Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 10 HR, 0.455 xSLG, 6% barrels on 236 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.485 xSLG, 6% barrels on 79 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/5 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.273Batting average last 30 days: 0.192
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 21.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 10Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Nick Loftin (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 41% of the time): 0 HR, 0.279 xSLG, 1% barrels on 77 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 4 HR, 0.479 xSLG, 9% barrels on 121 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.208Batting average last 30 days: 0.205
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 17.2%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 15Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Tyler Tolbert (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.58Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.3%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 41% of the time): 0 HR, 0.332 xSLG, 6% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (23% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Isaac Collins (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.16Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 1 HR, 0.442 xSLG, 6% barrels on 190 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 0 HR, 0.421 xSLG, 0% barrels on 41 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.229Batting average last 30 days: 0.169
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 22.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 13.9%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 15Triples vs RHP this season: 30. Matthew Lugo (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sinker (41% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (23% of the time): sample too thin (9 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Luke Maile (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sinker (he'll see it 41% of the time): 0 HR, 0.344 xSLG, 4% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 23% of the time): 1 HR, 0.573 xSLG, 10% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.152(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.095
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 32.4%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 2.9%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Josh Rojas (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.09Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 38% of the time): 7 HR, 0.549 xSLG, 8% barrels on 156 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Sinker (he'll see it 22% of the time): 2 HR, 0.454 xSLG, 5% barrels on 81 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 4/9 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.26Batting average last 30 days: 0.3
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 15.7%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.0%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 5Triples vs RHP this season: 0Sox v Foster Griffin (14 bats)0. Miguel Vargas (R)
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 1.16Model composite (chance rating): 15.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.5Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.9%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.729 xSLG, 14% barrels on 22 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 5 HR, 0.568 xSLG, 8% barrels on 98 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 1K0. Munetaka Murakami (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 15.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.18Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 15.9%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 2K0. Randal Grichuk (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.28Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 35% of the time): 0 HR, 0.515 xSLG, 4% barrels on 24 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 8 HR, 0.684 xSLG, 16% barrels on 130 batted balls, 2024–260. Colson Montgomery (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.64Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.6%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.334 xSLG, 5% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0K0. Andrew Benintendi (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.95Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Sweeper (he'll see it 27% of the time): 2 HR, 0.512 xSLG, 0% barrels on 23 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Kyle Teel (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 20.0%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Edgar Quero (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.39Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.2%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 35% of the time): 0 HR, 0.438 xSLG, 0% barrels on 15 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 2 HR, 0.494 xSLG, 7% barrels on 45 batted balls, 2024–260. Tristan Peters (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.56Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.1%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Chase Meidroth (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.31Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.5%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.547 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 5 HR, 0.580 xSLG, 6% barrels on 66 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 0K0. Brenton Doyle (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.45Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.805 xSLG, 17% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 6 HR, 0.630 xSLG, 11% barrels on 98 batted balls, 2024–260. Jake Rogers (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.46Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.6%vs the Cutter (35% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 2 HR, 0.641 xSLG, 14% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–260. Braden Montgomery (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.79Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.8%vs the Cutter (35% of the time): sample too thin (6 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 1 HR, 0.685 xSLG, 6% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–260. Sam Antonacci (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.55Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Sweeper (27% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Cutter (25% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Luisangel Acuña (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 1.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.36Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.1%vs the Cutter (35% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 17% of the time): 0 HR, 0.465 xSLG, 2% barrels on 43 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0KTigers v Braydon Fisher (14 bats)0. Riley Greene (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 16.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.71Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Curve (he'll see it 39% of the time): 5 HR, 0.923 xSLG, 28% barrels on 47 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 8 HR, 1.050 xSLG, 25% barrels on 55 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.288Batting average last 30 days: 0.125
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.8%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 9.6%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 20Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Dillon Dingler (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.07Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 8.3%vs the Slider (he'll see it 63% of the time): 3 HR, 0.556 xSLG, 3% barrels on 87 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 20% of the time): 2 HR, 0.488 xSLG, 3% barrels on 31 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.271Batting average last 30 days: 0.16
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.9%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.7%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 20. Colt Keith (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.1Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.7%vs the Curve (he'll see it 39% of the time): 0 HR, 0.764 xSLG, 21% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 4 HR, 0.554 xSLG, 6% barrels on 86 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.27Batting average last 30 days: 0.197
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 19.4%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 8.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 17Triples vs RHP this season: 40. Kevin McGonigle (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.76Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.3%vs the Curve (39% of the time): sample too thin (14 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 1 HR, 0.686 xSLG, 18% barrels on 17 batted balls, 2024–26
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.288Batting average last 30 days: 0.228
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 11.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 14.4%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 18Triples vs RHP this season: 30. Eduardo Valencia (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.06Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 9.3%vs the Slider (63% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Curve (20% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Spencer Torkelson (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.37Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.0%vs the Slider (he'll see it 63% of the time): 11 HR, 0.673 xSLG, 13% barrels on 110 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 20% of the time): 3 HR, 0.665 xSLG, 11% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Brett Callahan (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.25Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Curve (39% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (35% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.257Batting average last 30 days: 0.257
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 31.6%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 5.3%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 10. Hao-Yu Lee (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.01Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Slider (he'll see it 63% of the time): 0 HR, 0.429 xSLG, 6% barrels on 16 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (20% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedHistory vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 0K
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.286Batting average last 30 days: 0.265
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 7.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 7Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Max Clark (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.54Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.7%vs the Curve (39% of the time): sample too thin (5 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Slider (35% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.23Batting average last 30 days: 0.247
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 23.5%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 6.2%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 3Triples vs RHP this season: 10. John Peck (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Slider (63% of the time): sample too thin (2 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Curve (20% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.273(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)Batting average last 30 days: 0.267
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 16.7%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 4.2%(thin vs-hand sample — both hands pooled)
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 1Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Ben Malgeri (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.53Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.8%vs the Slider (63% of the time): sample too thin (8 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Curve (20% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated
Hits / Total Bases
Batting average vs RHP: 0.303Batting average last 30 days: 0.209
Strikeout
Strikeout rate vs RHP: 26.3%
Walk
Walk rate vs RHP: 10.5%
Doubles / Triples
Doubles vs RHP this season: 0Triples vs RHP this season: 00. Gleyber Torres (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.56Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.1%vs the Slider (he'll see it 63% of the time): 2 HR, 0.406 xSLG, 5% barrels on 148 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 20% of the time): 0 HR, 0.360 xSLG, 0% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–260. Zach McKinstry (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.2Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.2%vs the Curve (he'll see it 39% of the time): 1 HR, 0.479 xSLG, 4% barrels on 46 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Slider (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.465 xSLG, 6% barrels on 69 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/1 0HR 1K0. Javier Báez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 2.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.27Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.8%vs the Slider (he'll see it 63% of the time): 3 HR, 0.367 xSLG, 3% barrels on 110 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Curve (he'll see it 20% of the time): 0 HR, 0.326 xSLG, 0% barrels on 19 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/2 0HR 0KTwins v Max Fried (14 bats)0. Kody Clemens (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.46Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.2%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 51% of the time): 0 HR, 0.501 xSLG, 7% barrels on 71 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 16% of the time): 2 HR, 0.572 xSLG, 8% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–260. Ryan Jeffers (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.16Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.9%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 4 HR, 0.678 xSLG, 11% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 5 HR, 0.485 xSLG, 8% barrels on 91 batted balls, 2024–260. Josh Bell (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.1Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.504 xSLG, 7% barrels on 28 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 7 HR, 0.451 xSLG, 4% barrels on 131 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/7 0HR 2K0. Royce Lewis (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.39Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.6%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.356 xSLG, 5% barrels on 21 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 3 HR, 0.532 xSLG, 11% barrels on 73 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/3 0HR 1K0. Emmanuel Rodriguez (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sinker (51% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (16% of the time): sample too thin (0 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Trevor Larnach (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.46Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.9%vs the Sinker (he'll see it 51% of the time): 2 HR, 0.462 xSLG, 7% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 16% of the time): 1 HR, 0.444 xSLG, 4% barrels on 48 batted balls, 2024–260. Victor Caratini (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.53Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.8%vs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 2 HR, 0.597 xSLG, 9% barrels on 56 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/4 0HR 0K0. Ryan Kreidler (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.74Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.4%vs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (7 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 2 HR, 0.578 xSLG, 6% barrels on 36 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 0/5 0HR 2K0. Kaelen Culpepper (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 6.1Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.26Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.7%vs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (19% of the time): sample too thin (12 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Brooks Lee (S)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 5.7Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.9%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 3 HR, 0.607 xSLG, 15% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 5 HR, 0.607 xSLG, 10% barrels on 78 batted balls, 2024–260. Austin Martin (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.24Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 1.2%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 0 HR, 0.716 xSLG, 22% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 3 HR, 0.512 xSLG, 5% barrels on 83 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 1K0. Alex Jackson (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.5%vs the Cutter (27% of the time): sample too thin (4 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 3 HR, 0.531 xSLG, 15% barrels on 26 batted balls, 2024–260. Walker Jenkins (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0vs the Sinker (51% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (16% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Luke Keaschall (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 3.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.33Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.6%vs the Cutter (he'll see it 27% of the time): 1 HR, 0.667 xSLG, 15% barrels on 20 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 19% of the time): 1 HR, 0.516 xSLG, 6% barrels on 50 batted balls, 2024–26Yankees v Bailey Ober (14 bats)0. Spencer Jones (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.66Model composite (chance rating): 18.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.41Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 11.7%vs the Changeup (40% of the time): sample too thin (13 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 2 HR, 0.706 xSLG, 20% barrels on 46 batted balls, 2024–260. Luis García Jr. (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.66Model composite (chance rating): 18.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.57Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.7%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 40% of the time): 12 HR, 0.538 xSLG, 9% barrels on 177 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 11 HR, 0.685 xSLG, 13% barrels on 240 batted balls, 2024–260. Ben Rice (L)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.32Model composite (chance rating): 20.8Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 2.47Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 12.1%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 40% of the time): 5 HR, 0.551 xSLG, 11% barrels on 108 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 20 HR, 0.890 xSLG, 23% barrels on 185 batted balls, 2024–260. Aaron Judge (R)ELITE CONVERTER
Home Run
Doctrine score (the method's rating): 2.31Model composite (chance rating): 19.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 3.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 17.3%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 31 HR, 1.193 xSLG, 33% barrels on 169 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 8 HR, 1.036 xSLG, 25% barrels on 52 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/2 0HR 0K0. Amed Rosario (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 13.9Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.64Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.5%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 3 HR, 0.542 xSLG, 4% barrels on 45 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.446 xSLG, 6% barrels on 18 batted balls, 2024–260. Heliot Ramos (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.4Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.81Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.6%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 8 HR, 0.671 xSLG, 13% barrels on 163 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.418 xSLG, 3% barrels on 32 batted balls, 2024–260. Cody Bellinger (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.03Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 4.6%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 40% of the time): 3 HR, 0.360 xSLG, 2% barrels on 136 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 19 HR, 0.535 xSLG, 9% barrels on 295 batted balls, 2024–260. Paul Goldschmidt (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 12.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.21Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 10.7%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 12 HR, 0.612 xSLG, 11% barrels on 207 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.430 xSLG, 5% barrels on 39 batted balls, 2024–260. Austin Wells (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 11.3Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.62Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 6.8%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 40% of the time): 3 HR, 0.466 xSLG, 7% barrels on 107 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 17 HR, 0.668 xSLG, 14% barrels on 188 batted balls, 2024–260. Ryan McMahon (L)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 10.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 1.14Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.3%vs the Changeup (he'll see it 40% of the time): 5 HR, 0.606 xSLG, 11% barrels on 110 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 35% of the time): 14 HR, 0.712 xSLG, 14% barrels on 231 batted balls, 2024–260. José Caballero (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 9.0Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.84Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 5.8%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 7 HR, 0.577 xSLG, 8% barrels on 132 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 1 HR, 0.310 xSLG, 3% barrels on 31 batted balls, 2024–260. George Lombard Jr. (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 8.6Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.57Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 7.1%vs the Four-Seam (28% of the time): sample too thin (10 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, statedvs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (3 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated0. Anthony Volpe (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 7.2Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.08Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 2.9%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 11 HR, 0.600 xSLG, 12% barrels on 156 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (he'll see it 26% of the time): 0 HR, 0.276 xSLG, 3% barrels on 33 batted balls, 2024–26History vs this pitcher (last 3 seasons): 1/3 0HR 1K0. Ali Sánchez (R)
Home Run
Model composite (chance rating): 4.5Zone collision (his damage zones vs this delivery): 0.0Meatball conversion (HR per 100 heart-zone balls in play): 3.4%vs the Four-Seam (he'll see it 28% of the time): 0 HR, 0.324 xSLG, 0% barrels on 29 batted balls, 2024–26vs the Changeup (26% of the time): sample too thin (1 batted balls in 3 seasons) — unproven, stated